September 11, 2006
Another neo-con victim -- Ted Westhusing
The casualties of Iraq are many--soldiers, civilians, women and children, journalists and Ted Westhusing.
Yes, when immoral scum like Ricardo Sanchez, Geoffrey Miller and Tommy
Franks get heralded, medaled and promoted for their treachery and
deceit, willingness to depart from long-accepted norms of behavior and
implement torture and lack of concern about after-Saddam Iraq, the Ted
Westhusings, the ones retaining a conscience and sense of morality,
leave their lives behind.
EVERYTHING is relative is the actual guiding moral dictim of the Bush
Administration and nothing or no one will be left standing in pursuit
of its global master plan.
What about soldiers performing torture? "Hey, it's certainly nothing that we ever promoted (wink, wink)"
What about billions of dollars lost in webs of U.S. and Iraqi corruption? "Hey, democracy is untidy (wink, wink)"
What about hundreds of thousands of lives lost? "Such a focus is unpatriotic and aids the enemy (wink, wink)"
What about the authority and prestige of the United States being
decimated to that of just another thug nation? "To act based on the
feelings of others is harmful to the safety and national security of
our citizens (wink, wink)"
I don't know whether Ted Westhusing killed himself or was murdered,
although I'm leaning towards the latter. We will probably never know
the truth. But his departure from the living goes far beyond any
so-called loss of innocence. This loss was and has been a myth for
many, many decades, too often regurgitated by those too ignorant, too
defensive and too craven for honest and realistic discourse.
We have used our military and economic power to do great things.
Likewise, such has been used to do horrific deeds. Westhusing, for all
his intelligence and brilliance, seemingly failed to realize this, as
if it was too painful to disclose--until he landed in Iraq.
Ted Westhusing wasn't perfect. But this country needs more, not less
Ted Westhusings. He was deemed a roadblock, a dangerous one. His
conscience stood in the way of the neo-con master plan and his
elimination was necessary. He was simply disposable.
The following is an article and a book excerpt focusing on Ted
Westhusing. Both are written by T. Christian Miller. Do read both.
A Journey That Ended in Anguish
By T. Christian Miller
The Los Angeles Times
November 27, 2005
Col. Ted Westhusing, a military ethicist who volunteered to
go to Iraq, was upset by what he saw. His apparent suicide raises
questions.
"War is the hardest place to make moral judgments."
Washington - One hot, dusty day in June, Col. Ted Westhusing was found
dead in a trailer at a military base near the Baghdad airport, a single
gunshot wound to the head.
The Army would conclude that he committed suicide with his service
pistol. At the time, he was the highest-ranking officer to die in Iraq.
The Army closed its case. But the questions surrounding Westhusing's death continue.
Westhusing, 44, was no ordinary officer. He was one of the Army's
leading scholars of military ethics, a full professor at West Point who
volunteered to serve in Iraq to be able to better teach his students.
He had a doctorate in philosophy; his dissertation was an extended
meditation on the meaning of honor.
So it was only natural that Westhusing acted when he learned of
possible corruption by U.S. contractors in Iraq. A few weeks before he
died, Westhusing received an anonymous complaint that a private
security company he oversaw had cheated the U.S. government and
committed human rights violations. Westhusing confronted the contractor
and reported the concerns to superiors, who launched an investigation.
In e-mails to his family, Westhusing seemed especially upset by one
conclusion he had reached: that traditional military values such as
duty, honor and country had been replaced by profit motives in Iraq,
where the U.S. had come to rely heavily on contractors for jobs once
done by the military.
Go here to read the rest.
AND
Blood Money
by T. Christian Miller
Man of Honor
While his fellow soldiers prepared to unleash one of the most
spectacular land assaults in modern military history, Col. Ted
Westhusing was studying old wars. He was in the final months of writing
his doctoral dissertation at Emory University's department of
philosophy in the spring of 2003. His topic was honor. As the Third
Infantry Division charged into Iraq, Westhusing pored over ancient
Greek texts like those once preserved in Baghdad's libraries, comparing
them to modern Civil War novels and accounts of valor in America's more
recent wars. He was an archaeologist carefully sifting the history of
human violence: Achilles' savagery at Troy, Gen. Robert E. Lee's
compassion to an underling at Gettysburg, Gen. Matthew Ridgway's
turnaround of the Eighth Army's retreat in Korea. He sought an
understanding of what the Greeks called arete- skill, excellence, or
virtue - because Westhusing wanted to know, exactly, what honor meant
for the modern American soldier. "Born to be a warrior, I desire these
answers not just for philosophical reasons, but for self-knowledge," he
wrote.
Westhusing stood out on Emory's leafy green campus, which is not far
from downtown Atlanta. He was twice as old as some of his fellow
graduate students, with a buzz cut that grayed at the temples. They
showed up for class in shorts and flip-flops, Westhusing in slacks and
loafers. They stayed out late at campus bars,Westhusing had a wife and
three children. They were younger, but he was faster. Intensely
competitive, he had a physique as lean and hard as an ax head. He could
often be seen jogging through the hilly neighborhoods around campus in
camouflage and combat boots, a full rucksack strapped to his back. He
challenged his fellow students to race. "I'm ten years older than you,
man. You wouldn't last five minutes in the army!" he'd shout as he ran
past. And he finished his dissertation in three years - a year or two
earlier than most students. The story about his dissertation defense
was campus legend. Supposedly he had walked into the room in full dress
uniform, took a seat in front of his advisers, and placed his sidearm
wordlessly on the desk in front of him. It was apocryphal, but it spoke
to his Pattonesque reputation: bullheaded, self-assured, and packed
with military bravado.
Westhusing's unwavering belief in the United States made him a maverick
in another way. In a department of professional skeptics,Westhusing was
a believer. He saw things in black and white, true or false, right or
wrong. There was no room for relativism in Westhusing's world. He was a
deeply faithful Catholic who attended Mass nearly every Sunday. His
ardent, unalloyed patriotism burned brightly in the coffee shops and
classrooms of the mostly liberal institution. He loved his country,
loved serving it, loved defending it. "We have the finest fighting
force to ever exist, and we will get the job done, no matter what it
is," he said. Some found his conviction exhilarating. Westhusing got
into fierce debates with fellow students, leaving newspaper clippings
in mailboxes with comments circled in pen. He loved arguing about
Aristotle and Epictetus, Kant and Wittgenstein. "He enjoyed being the
voice of dissent.He definitely had a strong contrarian streak," said
Aaron Fichtelberg, a fellow student who went on to become a professor
at the University of Delaware, when we spoke of Westhusing in the fall
of 2005. Others found him rigid and inflexible. It was almost as if he
wasn't interested in digging too deeply into the issues, afraid of the
moral ambiguities he might find. One of his fellow graduate students
suggested a reading by liberal philosopher Martha Nussbaum that
questioned the value of patriotism. Westhusing refused even to attend
the discussion group. Instead he sent a typed three-page response
criticizing the article. "There were clearly things that Ted was not
willing to question. One of them was patriotism," Fichtelberg told me.
Westhusing stood out in the military too. He had graduated third in his
class at West Point. He became a Ranger and special forces instructor
with the legendary Eighty-second Airborne, serving in some of the
world's hot spots: East Berlin before the wall tumbled, Central America
during the proxy wars between the United States and the Soviet Union,
the demilitarized zone between North and South Korea.He loved working
with soldiers in the field, but it wasn't enough.He thought he could
have more influence by training America's next generation of officers.
He decided to teach at West Point.
There he returned to his devotion: honor. For Westhusing, honor was
what set the soldier apart from the rest of society. It gave a soldier
meaning, the military strength, and society structure. At West Point he
became one of the army's top ethicists, contributing to military
journals and grappling with the toughest issues of modern war. Emory
was a chance to deepen his knowledge. He learned ancient Greek and
modern Italian. When he graduated in 2003, he was one of only fourteen
out of eighty thousand officers in the army with a PhD in philosophy.
Go here to read the rest.
top
RSS feed
|