June 20, 2005
Are We Crawling, Walking Or Running Mr. President?
Credit President Bush with this 'evolutionary' explanation of democracy:
"It's the evolution of a baby," Bush said, "first you crawl, then you walk, then you sprint. Sometimes
people want to go straight to sprinting."
Uh, just where are we in the United States at Mr. President?
Mr. President, please read the following Jim Spencer/Denver Post column and do let me know if this is an example of crawling, walking or sprinting.
Could I add stumbling?
Lawmakers want in on the Secret
By Jim Spencer Denver Post Columnist
Finally, people with clout
have used the right description for the Bush administration's reaction
to the so-called Denver Three.
Coverup.
In a letter sent Thursday
to the head of the U.S. Secret Service, Colorado Reps. Mark Udall and
Diana DeGette and Sen. Ken Salazar asked to meet with agency officials
"in the next week" to find the name of the man who forced Karen Bauer,
Leslie Weise and Alex Young from President Bush's March 21 Social
Security forum in Denver before the president arrived at the
taxpayer-financed event.
"It has been nearly three
months since three individuals were removed from President Bush's
Social Security town hall in Denver," Udall, DeGette and Salazar wrote
to Secret Service Director M. Ralph Basham. "Each of us has called on
the Secret Service to conduct an investigation to determine if the
individual who removed these three persons unlawfully posed as an agent
or a law enforcement official. Even though the Secret Service has
conducted an investigation, the American people still do not have
answers.
"It has been reported in
the Denver media that the Secret Service knows the identity of the
person responsible for removing these three people from the event. The
lack of information from the Secret Service and the White House and
their unresponsiveness toward this matter gives the appearance of
either disinterest or a coverup."
On Thursday, in what has
become a typical runaround, an assistant White House press secretary
said the Secret Service would be the "point of contact" to talk about
the letter. The Secret Service then refused to comment on the letter in
any way. A spokesman would not even say whether the agency would meet
with Udall, DeGette and Salazar.
The Bush administration's
unwillingness to address this issue with the media has become standard
operating procedure. Dissing three members of Congress is something
else.
The Secret Service's job
is to protect the president from harm, not embarrassment. Determining
that the person who ran off Bauer, Weise and Young was not an agent -
as the Secret Service says it has - is not enough.
The guy who did this wore
an earpiece and lapel pin like an agent. Bauer, Weise and Young say the
man refused to identify himself but acted like an agent.
He told them to leave before Bush arrived,
not because they acted up
but because Republicans feared they might disrupt the president. They
had, after all, arrived in a car with a "No More Blood for Oil" bumper
sticker. They also wore "No More Lies" T-shirts hidden under their
clothes, which they had thought about exposing.
They didn't. They didn't do anything. And therein lies the scandal.
Newly disclosed memos
prove that only those who agree with the president on privatizing
retirement accounts get to speak at Bush's Social Security roadshow,
even though it is paid for by taxpayers of all political persuasions.
At a recent forum in New York, Bush actually used the word "propaganda" to describe what he is doing.
All presidents take that
approach to policy. But preemptively removing political opponents who
have committed no crime nor disrupted an official White House event
blurs the line between security and intimidation.
It is unconstitutional.
If it is not illegal, it's past time for the Secret Service to say why.
That means names and
circumstances. It means explaining who gets to wear earpieces and lapel
pins at White House events and what they get to do.
Someone can impersonate a law-enforcement officer without identifying himself as one. If it waddles and it quacks and all that.
That's why it is in
everyone's best interest to come clean as soon as possible. The
continuing silence makes it look like the White House has manipulated
the Secret Service into something the agency must never become:
A political arm of the president.
Jim Spencer's column appears Monday, Wednesday and Friday. He can be reached at 303-820-1771 or jspencer@denverpost.com.
top
RSS feed
|