I Cogitate
|
|||||||
|
September 29, 2005
Reason #35472 Why Iraq Invasion Was Not For Freedom President Bush gets his knickers all twisted while gushing about the benefits freedom, democracy and sovereignty has brought to Iraq. Well, some people sure do have a curious notion what freedom, democracy and sovereignty means. Okay, Mr. President, please answer this: why has the United States taken it upon itself to restructure Iraq's economic system? What part of the definitions of freedom, democracy and sovereignty does this entail? And this: which elements of freedom, democracy and sovereignty allowed your appointee, Paul Bremer, to issue 100 edicts or so involving Iraq as of 2004? Why Order 81 which "made it illegal for Iraqi farmers to reuse seeds harvested from new varieties registered under the law.?" Iraqi farmers were forced away from traditional methods to a system of patented seeds, where they can't grow crops without paying a licensing fee to an American corporation. (special thanks to Project Censored for the above item) Antonia Juhasz, in her July 21, 2004 article titled "The Handover That Wasn't," offers greater insight in the Iraqi economic machinations instituted by the United States: Order #39 allows for the following: (1) privatization of Iraq's 200 state-owned enterprises; (2) 100 percent foreign ownership of Iraqi businesses; (3) "national treatment" of foreign firms; (4) unrestricted, tax-free remittance of all profits and other funds; and (5) 40-year ownership licenses. Thus, it allows the U.S. corporations operating in Iraq to own every business, do all of the work, and send all of their money home. Nothing needs to be reinvested locally to service the Iraqi economy, no Iraqi need be hired, no public services need be guaranteed, and workers' rights can easily be ignored. And corporations can take out their investments at any time.As Rajiv Chandrasekaran and Walter Pincus wrote in their June 27, 2004 Washington Post article: "...An annex to the country's interim constitution requires the approval of a majority of Allawi's ministers, as well as the interim president and two vice presidents, to overturn any of Bremer's edicts. A senior U.S. official in Iraq noted recently that it would "not be easy to reverse" the orders..."Chandrasekaran and Pincus continue: "...As described in Order #39 on Foreign Investment, the Orders are intended to do no less than "transition [ Iraq ] from a ... centrally planned economy to a market economy..."Such noble largesse! And people wonder why some have questioned the long-term plans President Bush has for Iraq? Duh. top |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||