June 5, 2005
Bush Daughters To The Ramparts
Unemployment
is the pits. Summer is here and there's nothing for us to do. Lazing
around the house all day watching television is boring. The most
exciting thing was that airplane entering our restricted airspace a
while back. Whew, we barely got out of the jammies in time before we
had to evacuate. That could have been sooooo embarrassing. We would
have heard about that for months from our Georgetown bar buddies! Daddy
says he might take us to Europe with him if we behave. Mom's making us read--you
just can't take the librarian out of her! Some (probably Democrats, who
else would say it) have suggested we become Rosie-the-Riveter armament
workers to help the glorious cause but can you imagine what that would
do to our manicures? And we just heard about this nasty man in St.
Louis who says we actually should join the military. Blech!
Here is Bill McClellan's column from the St. Louis Post Dispatch:
Jenna, Barbara, Uncle Sam needs you more than ever
By Bill McClellan
Of the Post-Dispatch
05/27/2005
WITH
AFGHANISTAN still an unfinished job, Iraq still a work in progress and
Osama bin Laden still on the loose, it is ominous news indeed that the
Army has missed its recruiting quotas for the last three months. In
fact, things have gotten so untidy in the recruiting world that the
Army decreed a one-day stand-down last Friday during which the
recruiters were supposed to refocus on the rules of recruiting. There
had been too many stories of hard-pressed recruiters trying to work
around the rules.
It is time, I think, that the president's daughters enlist and volunteer for duty in Iraq.
I don't suggest this facetiously. In fact, I first thought about it
during the Republican convention in New York when the twins were much
in the news. They had both just graduated from college and both seemed
at loose ends. I might teach, said one. I might work with AIDS
patients, said the other. That is the sort of high-minded talk you
might expect from kids in their position. After all, their dad was
running for re-election. They couldn't say they were going to hang out,
which is exactly what I would do if I were a rich kid just getting out
of college. What's the big hurry about getting a job if you don't need
one?
So I thought, "Hey, they should join the Army! That's what kids at
loose ends have done for years." But then I remembered about the war. I
would not urge anybody to join the Army during a war. If they want to
do it, that's one thing. But I am not going to urge anybody to do so.
Then again, somebody has to enlist. The president decided we should
invade Iraq, and the people must have agreed. They re-elected him.
Wasn't that election a referendum on the war? I wrote a column earlier
this week in which I said it was. Many people responded and said they
voted for the president but did not do so to support the war. I find
that odd. To me, if a president decides to take our country to war - a
war that we did not have to fight - then that decision is the
overriding issue of the next election. War and peace. What is more
important?
Still, I think I know why people can support the president, but not the
war. The war does not touch them. There is no draft. If you're in the
upper middle class, chances are your kids are ignoring the whole thing.
So are you. There is no sense of shared sacrifice. We're not even
paying for the war. We're putting it on the credit card. Let the next
generation pay for it. In fact, we get tax cuts. The more you make, the
bigger your tax cut. Somebody else can fight the war and somebody else
can pay for it.
Whatever happened to that aphorism about to whom much is given much is
asked? What about the Bush girls? Much has been given to them. They've
got a great life, the best of everything. They're going to inherit
millions, and our new national thinking is that the rich ought to be
able to inherit millions without paying a penny. Let the working people
pay taxes.
So it would be refreshing if the Bush twins stepped forward and said,
"We've been given so much, we'd like to do our part. And as long as our
dad decided that American kids should fight in Iraq, we want to step
forward."
Such an attitude used to run in their family. We are familiar with
George W. Bush pulling strings to jump to the head of the waiting list
for the Texas Air National Guard and thus dodge service in Vietnam. But
the twins' grandfather stepped forward during World War II. He went to
the Pacific. Their great-grandfather stepped forward during World War
I. He went to Europe. So the twins would not be acting completely
against family history.
I'll bet the recruiters would love it. This war is a tough sell and
when the kids who've been given the most choose to sit on the
sidelines, why should the kids who've been given less step forward? For
bonuses? No, the best appeal the recruiters can make is to patriotism.
The president insists that what we are doing in Iraq is an important
thing and is worth the cost in blood. It would speak volumes, I think,
if his daughters were to say they agree with him.
top
RSS feed
|