I Cogitate
|
|||||||
|
March 16, 2005
Bush Issues Duck Call Quack For Freedom and Rule of Conscience If it sounds like a duck, is it a duck? Not in President Bush's case. For in his recent State of the Union speech, he has hauled out his oft-used duck call, this time quacking for freedom, liberty and democracy to become the status quo of governance around the world. Not a bad trifecta. I'm sure it went over quite well in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Uzbekistan. and that as you read this, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell is off to employ his particular voting machine magic in all three countries as they blossom into Shangri-la democracies.. Not only that, in the same speech he stated; "In America's ideal of freedom, the public interest depends on private character, on integrity and tolerance towards others, and the rule of conscience in our own lives. Well, let's examine the character, integrity, tolerance and rule of conscience President Bush has displayed as examples of his fervent belief:
My Funk and Wagnalls dictionary defines 'crisis' as: a critical moment, a turning point. President Bush, please explain why the year 2005 is so dire for Social Security? Could it be that your latest term in office concludes in 2008 and that there is a crisis in the West Wing? In 2018, the U.S. government can no longer borrow money from Social Security to pay for other expenses and actually must start paying back the billions already borrowed. That sounds like a crisis in government spending, not Social Security. So President Bush, why have you submitted annual budgets with the enormous deficits that have required borrowing from Social Security? Yes, changes need to be made because a deficit in Social Security will occur sometime between 2042 and 2052 but why is the only 'solution' pulling the plug on Social Security?
In this year's State of the Union speech, President Bush stated: "by the year 2042, the entire (Social Security) system would be exhausted and bankrupt." Well, he is either terribly misinformed or a liar, with neither exactly a positive. He simply chose to employ the same scare tactics he (and Dick Cheney) utilized in his 2004 presidential campaign in warning U.S. voters that their lives were in danger unless they voted for the Bush-Cheney ticket.
First, President Bush talks up privatization as the way to solve the problem with Social Security. Then, in a January 16, 2005 article in the Washington Post, he denies ever using such a word and issues an accusation of editorializing with their questions to two Washington Post reporters. The reporters then point it out to him his use of the word and he issues the lamest of excuses:"I'm surprised. Maybe I did. It's amazing what happens when you're tired." Real reason: 'privatization' didn't go over well with focus groups, so 'personal accounts' was deemed the words to use instead.Well, Texans have a saying to skewer imitation cowboys: "big hat, no cattle." What's the equivalent for here? Big talk, no character? Or worse, lofty talk, small cross? top |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||