August 31, 2006
Chalabi redux -- the cons get conned
The old saying, "if you lie down with dogs, you'll end up up
with fleas." While unfair to the dog genus, the following is
unfortunately but absolutely true: "If you lie down with Ahmad Chalabi,
you'll end up with egg on your face, thousands of dead and maimed
U.S. soliders, thousands of dead and maimed Iraqis, billions spent from
the U.S. Treasury, a loss of world respect, limited options for dealing
with real threats and a quagmire with no end."
Sounds like a topnotch guy, don't you think, regardless of his selfless
offering of sockpuppet defector Curveball to 'prove' the WMD case
against Saddam? What, was the name Screwball already taken?
Like a card player able to read the body language of his opponents,
Ahmad ("we are heroes in error" Chalabi 'played' George Bush and the
neo-cons like a sweet violin. Realizing what they thirsted for, he
slaked their fondest dreams and always stayed one step ahead in this
damning game of charades.
Read William River Pitt's article below and ask yourself: where is ABC,
NBC, CBS and CNN in exposing the noxious involvement of this ammunition
provider of the debacle our country now faces. How about even a
one hour special, ferreting out and especially focusing on Chalabi's
ties with Iran. Or a followup by The New York Times, The Washington
Post or The Los Angeles Times on the arrest of Chalabi? Or digging
deeper on the accusations ranging from currency fraud, grand theft of
various Iraqi assets, providing secret U.S. codebreaking information to
Iran (supposedly the FBI is investigating)?
For a guy who predicted he had the popular support to become the first
democratically elected prime minister of Iraq, his Iraqi National
Congress Party (paid $35,000,000 by the U.S. for whispering the right
things in the appropriate ears) couldn't win a SINGLE parliamentary
seat in the December 2005 election.
Remember the pimps and whores who promulgated such a disaster the next time you see a vet hobble or wheel past you.
The Chalabi Factor
William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t
July 28, 2006
Their man - the dissident leader who sat behind the first lady in the
president's box during the State of the Union address in which Bush
prepared the country for war - appeared to have been working for Iran
all along.
- James Bamford, "Iran: The Next War"
Ahmad Chalabi has been many things to many people over the last several years...
...For Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and the masterminds of the Iraq
invasion, however, Ahmad Chalabi was the anointed one, a
statesman-to-be, the man who would replace Saddam Hussein once they
figured out a way to attack and overthrow his regime. Chalabi had been
chosen for this position as early as 1997, before this whole mess was
anything more than a twinkle in the vice president's eye.
As it turns out, September 11 gave Rumsfeld and Cheney the pretext they
required. Once the so-called "cakewalk" of invasion was over, they
believed, Chalabi could be installed as the next Iraqi leader and the
nation could be happily run by remote control from Washington and
Houston.
It didn't quite work out that way...
...Author James Bamford, in a meticulously researched article for Rolling Stone titled "Iran: The Next War,"
has finally and completely ripped the cover off exactly what Mr.
Chalabi was doing while dressed in the clothing of an ally of the Bush
administration.
"For years," wrote Bamford, "the National Security
Agency had possessed the codes used by Iran to encrypt its diplomatic
messages, enabling the U.S. government to eavesdrop on virtually every
communication between Tehran and its embassies. After the U.S. invaded
Baghdad, the NSA used the codes to listen in on details of Iran's
covert operations inside Iraq. But in 2004, the agency intercepted a
series of urgent messages from the Iranian embassy in Baghdad.
Intelligence officials at the embassy had discovered the massive
security breach - tipped off by someone familiar with the U.S.
code-breaking operation."
"The blow to intelligence-gathering could not have
come at a worse time," continued Bamford. "The Bush administration
suspected that the Shiite government in Iran was aiding Shiite
insurgents in Iraq, who were killing U.S. soldiers. The administration
was also worried that Tehran was secretly developing nuclear weapons.
Now, crucial intelligence that might have shed light on those
operations had been cut off, potentially endangering American lives."
"On May 20th," continued Bamford, "shortly after the
discovery of the leak, Iraqi police backed by American soldiers raided
Chalabi's home and offices in Baghdad. The FBI suspected that Chalabi,
a Shiite who had a luxurious villa in Tehran and was close to senior
Iranian officials, was actually working as a spy for the Shiite
government of Iran. Getting the U.S. to invade Iraq was apparently part
of a plan to install a pro-Iranian Shiite government in Baghdad, with
Chalabi in charge. The bureau also suspected that Chalabi's
intelligence chief had furnished Iran with highly classified
information on U.S. troop movements, top-secret communications, plans
of the provisional government and other closely guarded material on
U.S. operations in Iraq. On the night of the raid, the CBS Evening News
carried an exclusive report by correspondent Lesley Stahl that the U.S.
government had 'rock-solid' evidence that Chalabi had been passing
extremely sensitive intelligence to Iran - evidence so sensitive that
it could 'get Americans killed.'"
"The revelation," concluded Bamford regarding
Chalabi's spying, "shocked [Defense Intelligence Agency member Larry]
Franklin and other members of [Defense Department official Douglas]
Feith's office. If true, the allegations meant that they had just
launched a war to put into power an agent of their mortal enemy, Iran.
Their man - the dissident leader who sat behind the first lady in the
president's box during the State of the Union address in which Bush
prepared the country for war - appeared to have been working for Iran
all along..."
To read the rest, go here.
top
RSS feed
|