August 21, 2007
Christian dominionism and why you should fear it - Chris Hedges
For the next two days, we are going to feature a little known subject
-- Christian dominionism -- that is stealthily flying under the radar.
Chris Hedges, of New York Times correspondent fame and Michael
Weinstein will be our guides. First is Hedges, followed tomorrow by
Weinstein. There may be a third day with a different author if we can
locate enough appropriate material.
Chris Hedges should be required reading whether or not you agree with
his viewpoint most of the time. He is that thought-provoking.
Among many, one of the very important things I learned from Hedges came
from a C-SPAN televised talk by him while on a book tour for his latest
offering "American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War On America."
In his speech, he said the left remains too soft and complacent. He
said dialogue is not possible with the venomous and the intolerent
because true dialogue includes respect and tolerance or it becomes an
actual fight for survival. He labeled the incitement of intolerence as
criminal and blatantly stated that the intolerent simply cannot be
tolerated. On one particular note, he concluded tolerence is a virtue
but tolerence, combined with passivity is a vice.
Hear ye, hear ye. Now on to this most important of subject matter.
Here's some background information on Hedges' new book:
From Publishers Weekly
The f-word
crops up in the most respectable quarters these days. Yet if the
provocative title of this exposé by Hedges (War Is a Force That
Gives Us Meaning)—sounds an alarm, the former New York Times foreign
correspondent takes care to employ his terms precisely and decisively.
As a Harvard Divinity School graduate, his investigation of the
Christian Right agenda is even more alarming given its lucidity. Citing
the psychology and sociology of fascism and cults, including the work
of German historian Fritz Stern, Hedges draws striking parallels
between 20th-century totalitarian movements and the highly organized,
well-funded "dominionist movement," an influential theocratic sect
within the country's huge evangelical population. Rooted in a radical
Calvinism, and wrapping its apocalyptic, vehemently militant, sexist
and homophobic vision in patriotic and religious rhetoric, dominionism
seeks absolute power in a Christian state. Hedges's reportage profiles
both former members and true believers, evoking the particular
characteristics of this American variant of fascism. His argument
against what he sees as a democratic society's suicidal tolerance for
intolerant movements has its own paradoxes.
Book Description
Twenty-five years ago,
when Pat Robertson and other radio and televangelists first spoke of
the United States becoming a Christian nation that would build a global
Christian empire, it was hard to take such hyperbolic rhetoric
seriously. Today, such language no longer sounds like hyperbole but
poses, instead, a very real threat to our freedom and our way of life.
In American Fascists, Chris Hedges, veteran journalist and author of
the National Book Award finalist War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning,
challenges the Christian Right's religious legitimacy and argues that
at its core it is a mass movement fueled by unbridled nationalism and a
hatred for the open society.
Hedges, who grew up in
rural parishes in upstate New York where his father was a Presbyterian
pastor, attacks the movement as someone steeped in the Bible and
Christian tradition. He points to the hundreds of senators and members
of Congress who have earned between 80 and 100 percent approval ratings
from the three most influential Christian Right advocacy groups as one
of many signs that the movement is burrowing deep inside the American
government to subvert it. The movement's call to dismantle the wall
between church and state and the intolerance it preaches against all
who do not conform to its warped vision of a Christian America are
pumped into tens of millions of American homes through Christian
television and radio stations, as well as reinforced through the
curriculum in Christian schools. The movement's yearning for
apocalyptic violence and its assault on dispassionate, intellectual
inquiry are laying the foundation for a new, frightening America.
To read more go here.
Here is an interview Hedges did with Salon:
The holy blitz rolls on The Christian right
is a "deeply anti-democratic movement" that gains force by exploiting
Americans' fears, argues Chris Hedges. Salon talks with the former New
York Times reporter about his fearless new book, "American Fascists."
Michelle Goldberg Salon
Jan. 08, 2007 |
Longtime war correspondent Chris Hedges, the former New York Times
bureau chief in the Middle East and the Balkans, knows a lot about the
savagery that people are capable of, especially when they're besotted
with dreams of religious or national redemption. In his acclaimed 2002
book, "War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning," he wrote: "I have been in
ambushes on desolate stretches of Central American roads, shot at in
the marshes of Southern Iraq, imprisoned in the Sudan, beaten by Saudi
military police, deported from Libya and Iran, captured and held for a
week by Iraqi Republican Guard during the Shiite rebellion following
the Gulf War, strafed by Russian Mig-21s in Bosnia, fired upon by Serb
snipers, and shelled for days in Sarajevo with deafening rounds of
heavy artillery that threw out thousands of deadly bits of iron
fragments." Hedges was part of the New York Times team of reporters
that won a 2002 Pulitzer Prize for explanatory reporting about global
terrorism.
Given such intimacy
with horror, one might expect him to be aloof from the seemingly less
urgent cultural disputes that dominate domestic American politics. Yet
in the rise of America's religious right, Hedges senses something akin
to the brutal movements he's spent his life chronicling. The title of
his new book speaks for itself: "American Fascists: The Christian Right
and the War on America." Scores of volumes about the religious right
have recently been published (one of them, "Kingdom Coming: The Rise of
Christian Nationalism," by me), but Hedges' book is perhaps the most
furious and foreboding, all the more so because he knows what fascism
looks like.
Part of his outrage is
theological. The son of a Presbyterian minister and a graduate of
Harvard Divinity School, Hedges once planned to join the clergy
himself. He speaks of the preachers he encountered while researching
"American Fascists" as heretics, and he's appalled at their desecration
of a faith he still cherishes, even if he no longer totally embraces
it. Writing of Ohio megachurch pastor Rod Parsley and his close
associate, GOP gubernatorial candidate Ken Blackwell, he says, "[T]he
heart of the Christian religion, all that is good and compassionate
within it, has been tossed aside, ruthlessly gouged out and thrown into
a heap with all the other inner organs. Only the shell, the form,
remains. Christianity is of no use to Parsley, Blackwell and the
others. In its name they kill it."
I first met Hedges at
last spring's War on Christians conference in Washington, D.C., where
Parsley, a wildly charismatic Pentecostal who loves the language of
holy war, electrified the crowd. ("I came to incite a riot!" he
shouted. "Man your battle stations! Ready your weapons! Lock and
load!") It was shortly before the publication of my book, and as Hedges
and I spoke, we realized we had similar takes on our subject. Both of
us relied on Hannah Arendt's analysis of totalitarian movements in
their early stages, and on some of the concepts that historian Robert
O. Paxton elucidated in his book "The Anatomy of Fascism." But where I,
anxious not to be seen as hysterical, tried to treat these ideas
gingerly, Hedges is unabashed and unsparing. His rage and contempt for
the movement's leaders, though, is matched by sympathy for its
followers, because he understands the despair, the desperate longing
for community and even the idealism that often drives them.
Hedges spoke to me on the phone from his home in New Jersey.
Go here for the interview.
Here is Hedges being interviewed by Amy Goodman on Democracy Now:
Chris Hedges on “American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War On America” February 19th, 2007
...AMY GOODMAN: It’s good to have you with us. Why did you write this book?
CHRIS HEDGES:
Anger. I mean, I grew up in the Church and, of course, as you
mentioned, graduated from seminary, and I think these people have
completely perverted and distorted and manipulated the Christian
message into something that is the very antithesis of certainly what
Jesus preached in the Gospels.
AMY GOODMAN: Who are “these people”?
CHRIS HEDGES:
These are -- you know, they’re not -- we use terms like “evangelical”
and “fundamentalist” to describe them, and I think that those are
incorrect terms. Traditional fundamentalists always called on believers
to remove themselves from the contaminants of secular society, shun
involvement in politics. Evangelical leaders like Billy Graham's always
warned followers to keep their distance from political power. He, of
course, was burned by Richard Nixon, came to Nixon’s defense and then
when it publicly came out that Nixon lied, it taught a lesson to
Graham.
This is a new movement,
as embodied by people like James Dobson or Pat Robertson or Jerry
Falwell, who call for the creation of a Christian state, who talk about
attaining secular power. And they are more properly called dominionists
or Christian reconstructionists, although it’s not a widespread term,
but they're certainly not traditional fundamentalists and not
traditional evangelicals. They fused the language and iconography of
the Christian religion with the worst forms of American nationalism and
then created this sort of radical mutation, which has built alliances
with powerful rightwing interests, including corporate interests, and
made tremendous inroads over the last two decades into the corridors of
power.
AMY GOODMAN: Why the term “dominionist”?
CHRIS HEDGES: It
come out of Genesis, you know, where God gives humankind dominion over
creation. It’s articulated by ideologues, such as Rousas Rushdoony,
Francis Schaeffer and others, and essentially is a new concept within
the radical Christian right, and it’s used sparingly. And some
dominionists don’t like the term, but I think it denotes or is probably
a better term for denoting those people who want to take political
power...
...CHRIS HEDGES:
That’s right. And, you know, this is -- I mean, essentially, when you
follow the logical conclusion of the ideology they preach, there really
are only two options for people who do not submit to their authority.
And it’s about submission, because these people claim to speak for God
and not only understand the will of God, but be able to carry it out.
Either you convert, or you’re exterminated. That’s what the obsession
with the End Times with the Rapture, which, by the way, is not in the
Bible, is about. It is about instilling -- it’s, of course, a
fear-based movement, and it’s about saying, ultimately, if you do not
give up control to us, you will be physically eradicated by a vengeful
God. And that lust for violence, I think that sort of -- you know, the
notion, that final aesthetic being violence is very common to
totalitarian movements, the belief that massive catastrophic violence
can be used as a cleansing agent to purge the world. And that’s, you
know, something that this movement bears in common with other despotic
and frightening radical movements that we’ve seen over the past --
throughout the past century.
Go here for the complete interview.
Finally, there is an article by Hedges himself.
Christianists on the March Chris Hedges Truthdig January 28, 2007
Dr. James Luther Adams,
my ethics professor at Harvard Divinity School, told his students that
when we were his age—he was then close to 80—we would all be fighting
the “Christian fascists.”
The warning, given 25
years ago, came at the moment Pat Robertson and other radio and
television evangelists began speaking about a new political religion
that would direct its efforts toward taking control of all
institutions, including mainstream denominations and the government.
Its stated goal was to use the United States to create a global
Christian empire. This call for fundamentalists and evangelicals to
take political power was a radical and ominous mutation of traditional
Christianity. It was hard, at the time, to take such fantastic
rhetoric seriously, especially given the buffoonish quality of those
who expounded it. But Adams warned us against the blindness caused by
intellectual snobbery. The Nazis, he said, were not going to return
with swastikas and brown shirts. Their ideological inheritors had found
a mask for fascism in the pages of the Bible.
He was not a man to use
the word fascist lightly. He had been in Germany in 1935 and 1936 and
worked with the underground anti-Nazi church, known as the Confessing
Church, led by Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Adams was eventually detained and
interrogated by the Gestapo, who suggested he might want to consider
returning to the United States. It was a suggestion he followed. He
left on a night train with framed portraits of Adolf Hitler placed over
the contents of his suitcases to hide the rolls of home-movie film he
had taken of the so-called German Christian Church, which was pro-Nazi,
and the few individuals who defied the Nazis, including the theologians
Karl Barth and Albert Schweitzer. The ruse worked when the border
police lifted the tops of the suitcases, saw the portraits of the
Führer and closed them up again. I watched hours of the grainy
black-and-white films as he narrated in his apartment in Cambridge...
...Adams saw in the
Christian right, long before we did, disturbing similarities with the
German Christian Church and the Nazi Party, similarities that he said
would, in the event of prolonged social instability or a national
crisis, see American fascists rise under the guise of religion to
dismantle the open society. He despaired of U.S. liberals, who, he
said, as in Nazi Germany, mouthed silly platitudes about dialogue and
inclusiveness that made them ineffectual and impotent. Liberals, he
said, did not understand the power and allure of evil or the cold
reality of how the world worked. The current hand-wringing by
Democrats, with many asking how they can reach out to a movement whose
leaders brand them “demonic” and “satanic,” would not have surprised
Adams. Like Bonhoeffer, he did not believe that those who would fight
effectively in coming times of turmoil, a fight that for him was an
integral part of the biblical message, would come from the church or
the liberal, secular elite.
His critique of the
prominent research universities, along with the media, was no less
withering. These institutions, self-absorbed, compromised by their
close relationship with government and corporations, given enough of
the pie to be complacent, were unwilling to deal with the fundamental
moral questions and inequities of the age. They had no stomach for a
battle that might cost them their prestige and comfort. He told me, I
suspect half in jest, that if the Nazis took over America “60 percent
of the Harvard faculty would begin their lectures with the Nazi
salute.” But this too was not an abstraction. He had watched academics
at the University of Heidelberg, including the philosopher Martin
Heidegger, raise their arms stiffly to students before class.
Two decades later, even
in the face of the growing reach of the Christian right, his prediction
seems apocalyptic. And yet the powerbrokers in the Christian right have
moved from the fringes of society to the floor of the House of
Representatives and the Senate. Forty-five senators and 186 members of
the House before the last elections earned approval ratings of 80 to
100 percent from the three most influential Christian right advocacy
groups—the Christian Coalition, Eagle Forum, and Family Resource
Council. President Bush has handed hundreds of millions of
dollars in federal aid to these groups and dismantled federal programs
in science, reproductive rights and AIDS research to pay homage to the
pseudo-science and quackery of the Christian right.
Bush will, I suspect,
turn out to be no more than a weak transition figure, our version of
Otto von Bismarck—who also used “values” to energize his base at the
end of the 19th century and launched “Kulturkampf,” the word from which
we get culture wars, against Catholics and Jews. Bismarck’s
attacks, which split Germany and made the discrediting of whole
segments of the society an acceptable part of the civil discourse,
paved the way for the Nazis’ more virulent racism and repression.
The radical Christian
right, calling for a “Christian state”—where whole segments of American
society, from gays and lesbians to liberals to immigrants to artists to
intellectuals, will have no legitimacy and be reduced, at best, to
second-class citizens—awaits a crisis, an economic meltdown, another
catastrophic terrorist strike or a series of environmental
disasters. A period of instability will permit them to push
through their radical agenda, one that will be sold to a frightened
American public as a return to security and law and order, as well as
moral purity and prosperity. This movement—the most dangerous
mass movement in American history—will not be blunted until the growing
social and economic inequities that blight this nation are addressed,
until tens of millions of Americans, now locked in hermetic systems of
indoctrination through Christian television and radio, as well as
Christian schools, are reincorporated into American society and given a
future, one with hope, adequate wages, job security and generous
federal and state assistance. The unchecked rape of America,
which continues with the blessing of both political parties, heralds
not only the empowerment of this American oligarchy but the eventual
death of the democratic state and birth of American fascism.
Go here for the entire article.
top
RSS feed
|