I Cogitate

Recent Posts My Best Blogs Archives Favorite Quotes Links Contact
March 18, 2005

Damn Liberal Media III


Miracles of miracles, the following was typed from the keyboard of the Washington Post's Howard Kurtz on March 14, 2005:

"In covering the Iraq war last year, 73 percent of the stories on Fox News included the opinions of the anchors and journalists reporting them, a new study says.

By contrast, 29 percent of the war reports on MSNBC and 2 percent of those on CNN included the journalists' own views.

These findings--the figures were similar for coverage of other stories--"seem to challenge" Fox's slogan of "we report, you decide," says the Project for Excellence in Journalism.

In a 617-page report, the group also found that "Fox is more deeply sourced than its rivals," while CNN is "the least transparent about its sources of the three cable channels, but more likely to present multiple points of view."

The project defines opinion as views that are not attributed to others.

Last March, Fox reporter Todd Connor said that "Iraq has a new interim constitution and is well on its way to democracy."

"Let's pray it works out," said anchor David Asman.

Another time, after hearing that Iraqis helped capture a Saddam Hussein henchman, Asman said: "Boy, that's good news if true, the Iraqis in the lead."

Fox legal editor Stan Goldman challenged the hiring of attorney Gloria Allred to represent Amber Frey (Scott Peterson's mistress), saying: "If you want to keep a low profile, Gloria is not the lawyer to represent you."

In an interview, Fox's executive daytime producer, Jerry Burke, says: "I encourage the anchors to be themselves. I'm certainly not going to step in and censor an anchor on any issue. . . . You don't want to look at a cookie-cutter, force-feeding of the same items hour after hour. I think that's part of the success of the channel, not treating our anchors like drones. They're, number one, Americans, and number two, human beings, as well as journalists."

CNN spokeswoman Christa Robinson says the study "reaffirms what anyone watching CNN already knows: CNN's reporting is driven by news, not opinion." MSNBC declined to comment.

The Project for Excellence in Journalism, a Washington-based research group, offers a three-part breakdown of cable journalists voicing their opinions. From 11 a.m. to noon, this happened on 52 percent of the stories on Fox, 50 percent on MSNBC and 2.3 percent on CNN. Among news-oriented evening shows, journalist opinions were voiced on 70 percent of the stories on Fox's "Special Report With Brit Hume," due in part to its regular analysts panel at the show's end; 9 percent on MSNBC's "Countdown With Keith Olbermann"; and 9 percent on CNN's "NewsNight With Aaron Brown."

There is more. Here is the article link.

top



Well, you have it straight from the gaping mouth of Jerry Burke: Fox staffers are "number one, Americans," followed by "human beings as well as journalists."

While a curious priority system, one thing is crystal clear: that the selection of whatever news to be reported and the actual reporting is Fox-filtered, meaning the anchors and reporters hired by Fox are ones that 'fit' and 'accept' the Fox culture of their presentations being shaded by the fact of being first and foremost Americans.

But more importantly, there is a missing element from this 'fact,' something Burke himself mentioned.
He stated: "I'm certainly not going to step in and censor an anchor on any issue..."

He already has by who he and others decided to hire. There are many forms of censorship. Providing no platform is one.

Because what is missing in this Howard Kurtz article or possibly not mentioned in the 617-page report is an analysis of the commentary of the Fox reporters and anchors. How do these uttered 'Americanism' opinions break down on the political spectrum? Do they break conservative, liberal or down the middle?

Your guess?

top



RSS feed link RSS feed

Recent Posts My Best Blogs Archives Favorite Quotes Links Contact