March 18, 2005
Damn Liberal Media III
Miracles of miracles, the following was typed from the keyboard of the Washington Post's Howard Kurtz on March 14, 2005:
"In covering the Iraq war last year, 73 percent of the stories on Fox News included the opinions of the anchors and journalists reporting them, a new study says.
By contrast, 29 percent of the war reports on MSNBC and 2 percent of those on CNN included the journalists' own views.
These findings--the figures were similar for coverage of
other stories--"seem to challenge" Fox's slogan of "we report, you
decide," says the Project for Excellence in Journalism.
In a 617-page report, the group also found that "Fox is more deeply
sourced than its rivals," while CNN is "the least transparent about its
sources of the three cable channels, but more likely to present
multiple points of view."
The project defines opinion as views that are not attributed to others.
Last March, Fox reporter Todd Connor said that "Iraq has a new interim constitution and is well on its way to democracy."
"Let's pray it works out," said anchor David Asman.
Another time, after hearing that Iraqis helped capture a Saddam Hussein
henchman, Asman said: "Boy, that's good news if true, the Iraqis in the
lead."
Fox legal editor Stan Goldman challenged the hiring of attorney Gloria
Allred to represent Amber Frey (Scott Peterson's mistress), saying: "If
you want to keep a low profile, Gloria is not the lawyer to represent
you."
In an interview, Fox's executive daytime producer, Jerry Burke, says:
"I encourage the anchors to be themselves. I'm certainly not going to
step in and censor an anchor on any issue. . . . You don't want to look
at a cookie-cutter, force-feeding of the same items hour after hour. I
think that's part of the success of the channel, not treating our
anchors like drones. They're, number one, Americans, and number two,
human beings, as well as journalists."
CNN spokeswoman Christa Robinson says the study "reaffirms what anyone
watching CNN already knows: CNN's reporting is driven by news, not
opinion." MSNBC declined to comment.
The Project for Excellence in Journalism, a Washington-based research
group, offers a three-part breakdown of cable journalists voicing their
opinions. From 11 a.m. to noon, this happened on 52 percent of the
stories on Fox, 50 percent on MSNBC and 2.3 percent on CNN. Among
news-oriented evening shows, journalist opinions were voiced on 70
percent of the stories on Fox's "Special Report With Brit Hume," due in
part to its regular analysts panel at the show's end; 9 percent on
MSNBC's "Countdown With Keith Olbermann"; and 9 percent on CNN's
"NewsNight With Aaron Brown."
There is more. Here is the article link.
top
Well, you have it straight from the
gaping mouth of Jerry Burke: Fox staffers are "number one, Americans,"
followed by "human beings as well as journalists."
While a curious priority system, one thing is crystal clear: that the
selection of whatever news to be reported and the actual reporting is
Fox-filtered, meaning the anchors and reporters hired by Fox are ones
that 'fit' and 'accept' the Fox culture of their presentations being
shaded by the fact of being first and foremost Americans.
But more importantly, there is a missing element from this 'fact,' something Burke himself mentioned. He stated: "I'm certainly not going to step in and censor an anchor on any issue..."
He already has by who he and others decided to hire. There are many forms of censorship. Providing no platform is one.
Because what is missing in this Howard Kurtz article or possibly not
mentioned in the 617-page report is an analysis of the commentary of
the Fox reporters and anchors. How do these uttered 'Americanism'
opinions break down on the political spectrum? Do they break
conservative, liberal or down the middle?
Your guess?
top
RSS feed
|