October 4, 2005
The Straight Dish on the Bush Administration from Joe Galloway
Joe
Galloway doesn't suffer fools gladly. He is a journalist who takes the
responsibility accompanying such a professional choice seriously, one
of
the best in the business (and it is a business) and an individual who
should be a regular on
"Charlie Rose" in lieu of a number of the Washington Post and New York
Times reporters who appear so often.
And that leads to the question of just where is the backbone of so many
in the D.C. and Gotham media elite? Isn't it about time that the White
House reporters and others turn their spineless backs en masse to the misinformation,
distortions and outright lies distributed by the current powers-that-be?
The majority of the invertebrated mainstream media face the choice of either continuing
to carry tainted water for the Bush Administration or perform their
respective duties honorably and respectably.
As for Galloway, he has swallowed enough of the pap (feel free to replace the first 'p' and replace it with 'cr') dished out by
McClellan, Rumsfeld, Bush et al.
Read on (I have printed the entire article, something I try never
do because of appropriateness, due to the impact of Galloway's article in its totality--I thank you Joseph Galloway):
By JOSEPH L. GALLOWAY
Knight Ridder Newspapers
Sep. 28, 2005
WASHINGTON
- Well, they finally got to the bottom of the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse
scandal this week. An Army court martial convicted Pfc. Lynndie England
and sentenced her to three years in prison and a dishonorable discharge
for holding that leash, pointing with scorn and other offenses.
They've gotten to the bottom, all right. With Pfc. England's
conviction, that wraps up the cases against nine enlisted soldiers who
starred in those terrible digital photos in late 2003.
So that's it, huh? Not exactly. We still haven't gotten to the top of
this scandal, the Guantanamo problems and the questions that were
raised last week by an Army captain from the 82nd Airborne Division who
is troubled by, of all things, a conscience.
Capt. Ian Fishback, a West Point graduate, was a lieutenant in both
Afghanistan and Iraq when he became troubled by what he was seeing:
American soldiers beating Iraqi detainees until their arms and legs
were broken. Death threats. Extreme forced physical exertion. Sleep
deprivation. Exposure to the elements.
He began a 17-month journey, or attempted journey, up the chain of
command, asking, then pleading for simple guidance on whether American
troops in Iraq were bound by terms of the Geneva Conventions. He wrote
a letter to the two top Republicans on the Senate Armed Services
Committee, John Warner, R-Va., and John McCain, R-Ariz.
"This is a tragedy," he wrote. "I can remember, as a cadet at West
Point, resolving to ensure that my men would never commit a
dishonorable act; that I would protect them from that type of burden."
What did this honorable American officer ask that was so hard? "Give
(our soldiers) a clear standard that is in accordance with the bedrock
principles of our nation."
Capt. Fishback added: "Some argue that since our actions are not as
horrifying as al-Qaeda's we should not be concerned. When did al-Qaeda
become any type of standard by which we measure the morality of the
United States?"
Nobody in his chain of command showed the slightest concern about what
the captain reported and what he sought. Nobody showed any interest
until Human Rights Watch revealed details of his case last week.
Then the Army got very interested. Orders went down to interrogate the
captain and demand that he identify two sergeants who also witnessed
some of the abuse. Once again, the powers-that-be were eager to get to
the bottom of the issue. Find some enlisted men or non-coms and hang
them out to dry.
Shame on them.
And unless the good senators are ready at last to step up to the plate
and hold independent hearings on the question of how the Unites States
treats prisoners or detainees who end up in American custody anywhere
in the world, shame on them, too.
We've been treated to the spectacle of a Republican-controlled House
and Senate abdicating their constitutional responsibility to conduct
rigorous oversight of actions and failings of the executive branch of
government. This has gone on for the four-plus years that George W.
Bush has occupied the White House, and it looks as if we'll get more of
the same for three more years and a bit.
There have been 17 separate investigations of Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo
and other prisoner abuse scandals. All have gone straight to the bottom
of every case. All have consistently claimed that no one higher up the
chain of command, including the civilian leadership in the Pentagon,
bears any responsibility for any of this.
Hogwash. BS. Nonsense.
If the lowest private fails, then others have failed in training,
leading and directing that private. The chain runs from sergeant to
lieutenant to captain to lieutenant colonel to colonel to one, two,
three and four stars, on to the longest serving, most arrogant
secretary of defense in our history, Donald H. Rumsfeld, and beyond him
to the commander in chief, President Bush.
It's long past time for responsibility to begin flowing uphill in this
administration. It's time for our leaders to take responsibility for
what's being done in all our names and under our proud flag. It's time
for Congress to do its job if the administration won't do its job.
The Teflon is wearing off this administration in a hurry. It's past
time for an end to strutting, victory laps, crowing to the skies and
boasting "Bring 'em on!" Now is the time to provide the leadership our
troops deserve. Now is the time to state plainly and unequivocally that
we are Americans, and we live by a rule of law that protects everyone,
even the worst terrorist who ever fell into our hands. Maybe especially
the worst terrorist who ever fell into our hands.
ABOUT THE WRITER
Joseph L. Galloway is the senior military correspondent for Knight
Ridder Newspapers and co-author of the national best-seller "We Were
Soldiers Once ... and Young." Readers may write to him at
jgalloway@krwashington.com
For those in the press who cry
foul over my accusations, well, then prove me wrong. Run with the
following, put it in the frontpage headlines, lead the nightly news
broadcast with this. From the AmericanProgress.org site:
"At this moment, more than a dozen Iraqi battalions have completed training and are conducting anti-terrorist operations in Ramadi and Fallujah. More than 20
battalions are operating in Baghdad. And some have taken the lead in
operations in major sectors of the city. In total, more than 100
battalions are operating throughout Iraq. Our commanders report that
the Iraqi forces are operating with increasing effectiveness."
-- President Bush, 9/28/05
VERSUS
"The number of Iraqi battalions capable of combat without U.S. support has dropped from three to one, the top American commander in Iraq told Congress Thursday."
-- Associated Press, 9/29/05
Leave
it to The Daily Show's Jon Stewart to point out the absolute disregard
President Bush has for the American public, but more importantly, for
the American troops he has personally put in harm's way in Iraq. Based
on his lies, soldiers needlessly die. All for political favor. Is there
anything Bush won't lie about?
If the vast majority in the mainstream press
won't grow a backbone, then how about the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign
Wars organizations demanding the truth on the behalf of the soldiers
they supposedly represent, instead of begging for a pat on the head and
acting like the most cowed of lap dogs when convening with the
Commander-In-Chief?
But that's another disgusting story...
top
RSS feed
|