August 31, 2007
John Edwards representing you
I still haven't made up my mind -- it's between Edwards and obama for me in the California primary.
Initially, I felt Obama was the freshest face but, more importantly,
possessed the best chance of ever reforming our democracy into one
where the everday person and worker has the fairest chance of being
represented vis-s-vis legislation and policy.
I'm still leaning that way.
But of late, John Edwards speeches have caught my ear, brain and heart.
With his rhetoric, he is the one coming the closest to what I want in a
president and what I want to see across my country.
This is going to be a very tough decision.
How I will decide it will probably come down to which of these two candidates has the best chance of winning the presidency.
The following is an oldie but a goodie. It clearly demonstrates John
Edwards, the trial lawyer. And no, I do not believe being a trial
lawyer will be a hindrance. My thinking is based simply upon Edwards
asking, whether it be his Democratic primary opponents or his GOP
opponent, questions such as: what have you done to better the lives of
everyday folk? How many times have you decided to cast your lot with
the corporation rather than the individual? Have you voted for a
minimum wage increase? What have you done to provide affordable
medical/health coverage to every American? What have you done to keep
and create jobs in America?
Any trial lawyer smear can be effectively countered. In fact, it can be
used as a positive, in a [it pains me to type this] Rovian way. Who
can't identify with the feeling of impotence when challenging the
behemoths who run this country? Who wouldn't want someone such as John
Edwaeds on their side?
Eager to Face Any Jury — and the Voters Edwards Shows the Traits That Made Him a Feared Litigator Dale Russakoff The Washington Post February 2, 2004
RALEIGH, N.C. -- From
rural courthouses with Confederate memorials out front to the vast
judicial complex in this New South capital, lawyers across North
Carolina had the same rule of thumb for going up against their
colleague John Edwards: Never let him near a jury.
"The problem was that
all the older women wanted to take him home as their son, and all the
younger ones wanted to go out with him," rued an attorney for several
doctors sued by Edwards on behalf of brain-damaged babies. "You'd
think, 'Okay, if the women like him, the men must hate him.' But then
the guys just saw him as one of them."
Edwards's appeal as a
candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination may have jolted
the pundits -- given a political résumé that begins and
ends with five years in the U.S. Senate -- but it was no surprise to
hundreds of doctors, trucking company officials and manufacturers who
had faced him in court. In barely 15 years, beginning at age 31, he won
more than $175 million in settlements and verdicts -- $3.7 million for
an alcoholic permanently disabled by an overdose of the drug Antabuse;
$6.5 million for a 4-year-old boy whose parents were crushed by a
speeding tractor-trailer; $25 million for a 5-year-old girl who lost
most of her intestines when she sat atop an unprotected wading-pool
drain. Based on data kept by North Carolina Lawyers' Weekly, no other
trial lawyer in the state came close.
His strengths as a
campaigner were all there, they say now -- the easy-listening oratory
that makes everything sound simple, the common touch, the steely
self-assurance swaddled in Southern respectfulness, the driving
ambition.
Adversaries as well as
partners said he routinely out-prepared and outperformed them. But his
biggest distinction was what more than one called an "unnerving"
appetite for putting his case before a jury, even though most victories
-- his included -- came in settlements, not trials. Knowing his record
-- of about 70 trials over 15 years, defense and plaintiffs lawyers
said he lost only two or three -- defendants offered hefty settlements
to avoid a showdown.
That trait also has a
parallel in Edwards the campaigner. " 'Let me put my case to the jury,'
'Let me debate George Bush.' It's exactly the same thing," said Dan
McLamb, a malpractice defense lawyer who is a close friend of Edwards.
Edwards now speaks
almost interchangeably of jurors and voters. "I trusted them because of
the way I grew up, with ordinary Americans," he said of juries in an
interview Friday, much as he often mentions his son-of-a-mill-worker
origins to voters.
Go here for the remainder.
top
RSS feed
|