October 6, 2005
Jon Tester - who and what this country needs in the U.S. Senate
When all is said, written,
done, smeared, flung, posted, charged, disavowed, Roved and paid for in
the 2006 national elections, the most important result will be that of
Democratic challenger Jon Tester versus Republican incumbent Conrad
Burns for the U.S. Senate seat in Montana.
Yes, other races will also be critical but this particular one, if
Tester is elected, will again demonstrate to many still dubious in the
Democratic Party hierarchy that integrity, honesty and speaking out and
standing up for personal values can be a winning combination in the
Mountain West, and that this combination can and should be emulated
throughout the rest of the country--if the Democratic Party truly
desires to experience a rebirth.
Why Jon Tester?
Jon Tester has not and will not allow the corporate world to attach a nose ring and lead him about.
Jon Tester is your average Joe--a lifelong farmer who employs common
sense and values in making a living--not a politician turned lobbyist,
turned politician, turned lobbyist...
Jon Tester has lived his personal and political life as a testament to
what is right with this country--not as a
which-paid-for-foreign-golfing-junket-am-I-off-to-this-weekend?
Simply put, Jon Tester didn't enter the political world as a means of enriching himself. He sees his role as one of service.
Let Tester himself describe what he believes versus that of his opponent:
1)
We stood up and demanded a real energy policy that addresses America’s
energy needs while recognizing the need for conservation, renewable
energy development, and the strengthening of our rural economies.
2)
We stood up and said that it’s time for this foolish talk about
privatizing Social Security to come to an end so we can deal with real
issues facing America.
3) We declared, “You can’t rebuild
America by tearing American workers down” and called on the White House
to reverse their decision on Davis-Bacon (reducing wages to workers
rehabbing the Gulf Coast).
4) We said that we've had enough of Washington’s pay-to-play, win-at-all-costs attitude.
5)
And we stood up and said that Washington D.C. needs real leadership to
deal with the deficit today - so that our children aren’t left paying
our debts.
And here is a good zinger
from Tester about why change and a new set of values are necessary to
clean up the corruption oozing from D.C.:
"...But let me tell you something. I’ve been a farmer my entire life, and I
can tell you from experience that no matter how hard you try, you can’t
convince a hog to shovel its own bull..."
Read what Bob Brigham posted in his diary on September 30, 2005:
As Goes Montana, So Goes the Democratic Party
by Bob Brigham
I
was fortunate enough to grow up in Montana, to go to school in Montana,
and to learn politics in Montana. Senator Max Baucus was the first
politician I volunteered for, yet I now view him as being worse for the
Democratic Party than Zell Miller.
The maturation I've experienced is a process that Democrats, for the good of our Party, need to embrace.
That is why next year's Senate Primary in Montana is critical to the future of our Party.
Nationally, the Democratic Party is divided between the DLC and the
base, between those who want to not lose and those who will not back
down, between big money and populism.
Democrats need to leave behind the failed ways of the DLC. And that begins in Montana.
This internal battle has played out in Montana as well. In Big Sky
Country, the people are represented by Governor Brian Schweitzer and
the DLC is represented by Senator Max Baucus.
Governor Schweitzer is a populist, a man of the people. Baucus is just
another slick, lawyer who survives because he is an incumbent. But a
Baucus style Democrat will not be sent to Washington DC by Montanans.
In 1996, it was Jack Mudd who tried this approach and was toasted as
another slick lawyer politician. In 1998, it was Dusty Deschampes who
tried this approach and was toasted as another slick lawyer politician.
In 2000, the Max Baucus crew gave up on trying to beat Conrad Burns,
but Brian Schweitzer ran anyway and almost won - even with little
institutional support. The Baucus machine wasn't offered to Schweitzer,
so he built his own movement of the people, by the people, and for the
people - from the ground up.
Fast forward to 2004 and the "Montana Miracle" sweep of both houses and
the governor's mansion...which set up Montana as one of the most
crucial states in 2006.
Republican Senator Conrad Burns is the up to his cowboy hat in the Jack
Abramoff scandal and is primed for a beating at the polls. The only way
Burns can get re-elected is if he is lucky enough to face a challenger
that can be branded as another slick lawyer...
...But do not despair, because Montana is also home to another authentic
man of the people like Brian Schweitzer. His name is Jon Tester, he is
the President of the State Senate and is the most authentic candidate
running for the U.S. Senate anywhere in America...
Go to Jon Tester's web site and do what you can for him, for Montana, for the Democratic Party and for this country.
Paul Simon and Art Garfunkel were wrong--it's happening in Montana, not just at the zoo.
top
RSS feed
|