December 19, 2006
Jonathan Chait says 'Bubble Boy' isn't just a Seinfeld character
Jonathan Chait is a senior editor of The New Republic
and often described as a liberal hawk. He supported the war in Iraq but
has been mightily tested by the handling and direction of it by the
Bush Administration. He has doubted the capability of George Bush for
some time--consider the headline on a July 16, 2006 Chait column:
"Is Bush Still Too Dumb to Be President? You can’t run a country on horse sense"
In the following, he portrays George Bush as the ultimate 'work-around'
President, meaning it's necessary to get to him first if influencing
his decision-making is the goal. Plus, there are some subjects NEVER to
bring up. Or these testy subjects need to be couched in a sugar
coating.
I think it's necessary to repeat that George Bush is not unintelligent.
It's more his personality and his personal needs (frailities) that
influence him and his decision-making. Playing to him is uppermost,
servitude absolutely critical, plying him with a charade of faux
deference and obsequiousness defines any interaction if the outcome you
desire is to be a possibility.
In a sad and scary way, this is a variation of America held hostage. Two years until release.
The bubble boy in the Oval Office
Try to mend Iraq all you want; just don't tell Bush the war was a mistake.
Jonathan Chait
Los Angeles Times
December 10, 2006
THERE IS a famous "Twilight Zone" episode about a little boy in a small
town who has fantastical powers. Through the misuse of his powers, the
little boy has ruined the lives of everybody in the town for
instance, teleporting them into a cornfield, or summoning a snowstorm
that destroys their crops. Because anyone who thinks an unhappy thought
will be banished, the adults around him can do nothing but cheerfully
praise his decisions while they try to nudge him in a less destructive
direction.
This episode kept popping into my head when I was reading about
President Bush and the Baker-Hamilton commission. Bush is the president
of the United States, which therefore gives him enormous power, but he
is treated by everybody around him as if he were a child.
Consider a story in the latest Time magazine, recounting the efforts
before the commission was approved by Congress of three
supporters to enlist Condoleezza Rice to win the administration's
approval for the panel. Here is how Time reports it:
"As the trio departed, a Rice aide asked one of her suitors not to
inform anyone at the Pentagon that chairmen had been chosen and the
study group was moving forward. If Rumsfeld was alerted to the study
group's potential impact, the aide said, he would quickly tell Cheney,
who could, with a few words, scuttle the whole thing. Rice got through
to Bush the next day, arguing that the thing was going to happen
anyway, so he might as well get on board. To his credit, the President
agreed."
The article treats this exchange in a matter-of-fact way, but, what it
suggests is completely horrifying. Rice apparently believed that Bush
would simply follow the advice of whoever he spoke with. Therefore the
one factor determining whether Bush would support the commission was
whether Cheney or Rice managed to get to him first.
And now that the Baker-Hamilton report is out, the commissioners are
carefully patronizing the commander in chief. As this newspaper
reported, "Members of the commission said they were pleased that Bush
gave them as much attention as he did, a full hour's worth. 'He could
have scheduled us for 20 minutes plus 10 minutes for the cameras,' said
former Atty. Gen. Edwin M. Meese III." Wow, a commission devoted
hundreds or thousands of man-hours to addressing the central conundrum
of U.S. foreign policy, and the president gave them a whole hour of his
time!
In return for these considerations, the commission generously avoided
revisiting the whole question of who got us into this fiasco and how.
As the Washington Post put it, "The panel appeared to steer away from
language that might inflame the Bush administration." Of course,
"inflame" is a word typically associated with street mobs or other
irrational actors. The fact that the president can be "inflamed" is no
longer considered surprising enough to merit comment.
Go here to read the rest.
top
RSS feed
|