I Cogitate
|
|||||||
|
August 16, 2006
Keith Olbermann's reality bites -- the nexus of politics and terror Keith Olbermann didn't do the impossible on a segment of his COUNTDOWN show Monday night. No, he did the responsible. Something that anyone blessed by being in highly visible position in the mass media could have achieved--if so inclined. Olbermann reconstructed a timeline featuring government terror announcements, dissenting opinions and political opportunism. It's powerful material so much so that the vast majority in the national media will simply dismiss it as conspiratorial kookiness. Of course, these same elite won't bother reading the COUNTDOWN transcript or watching the video. They don't have to. They know truth. Excuse me, they 'feel' truth (nod to Stephen Colbert). Right, Karl Rove wouldn't do such a thing as employ terror for political gain. He 'limits' himself to smearing opponents as pedophiles, tarnishing the wife and child of an opponent with drug addiction blasphemies and born-out-of-prostitution whispers. Surely, George Bush, with Jesus as his favorite philosopher, wouldn't allow (participate?) in such a deceitful and devious scheme. Would he? And rather than rant and rave and go off half-cocked like you-know-who (sadly, many names can be inserted here), Olbermann concluded this segment with this Murrow-like conclusion: "...In all fairness, as we observe last October and we observer again tonight, we could possibly construct a similar timeline of terror events and warnings and their relationship to the opening of new chain stores around the country. But if merely a reasonable case could be made that any of these juxtapositions of events are more than just coincidences, especially the one last week in which terror policy was again injected directly into a political race, it underscores the need for questions to be asked in this country, questions about what is prudence and what is fear-mongering." Okay, where are YOU Brian Williams? Where are YOU Charles Gibson? Where are YOU Bob Schieffer? Back to Olbermann: OLBERMANN: The term we employ is the nexus of politics and terror. It does not imply that there is no terror, but it also does not deny that there is politics. And it refuses to assume that counterterror measures in this country are not being influenced by politics.Yes, please do so after reading the rest of the segment here. (be prepared to scroll down about a third of the way) top |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||