April 4, 2005
Moe, Larry & Curley
John Cornyn, Tom DeLay and Bill Frist. Actually, Tom Delay is more Moe-like
so maybe he should be listed first. Feel free to mix-and-match these
three politicians (sorry to all you politicians out there but I had to
use such an appelation) to whichever stooge is most appropriate (my
deepest apology to any and all stooges).
Just what is Cornyn running for? And to think he was formerly on the
Texas Supreme Court! This giant legal mind is making himself sound like
he should be perched atop his favorite stool at The Drink and Spew
Tavern.
Tom DeLay. Would someone please check if he accidentally locked himself
inside a tented house back when all he was exterminating was pesty
termites? The Democratic Party is attempting to build a bigger
tent--DeLay wants to zap it with his favorite bug killer.
Why did Bill Frist become a politico? Was it the frustration caused by
his medical oath to first do no harm? This is a man, to his credit, who
does honorable, pro bono medical work in various third world countries
but never passes on an opportunity to carry kindling for the
fire-breathers in his GOP. Just what does Bill Frist truly believe and
when did he believe it?
For the evolution-denying right, here are three examples that Darwin was right. In this case though, it's de-evolution.
Read on.
NEW YORK TIMES EDITORIAL
The Judges Made Them Do It
April 6, 2005
It was appalling when the House
majority leader threatened political retribution against judges who did
not toe his extremist political line. But when a second important
Republican stands up and excuses murderous violence against judges as
an understandable reaction to their decisions, then it is time to get
really scared.
It happened on Monday, in a moment
that was horrifying even by the rock-bottom standards of the campaign
that Republican zealots are conducting against the nation's judiciary.
Senator John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, rose in the chamber and dared
to argue that recent courthouse violence might be explained by distress
about judges who "are making political decisions yet are unaccountable
to the public." The frustration "builds up and builds up to the point
where some people engage in" violence, said Mr. Cornyn, a former member
of the Texas Supreme Court who is on the Senate Judiciary Committee,
which supposedly protects the Constitution and its guarantee of an
independent judiciary.
Listeners could only cringe at the
events behind Mr. Cornyn's fulminating: an Atlanta judge was murdered
in his courtroom by a career criminal who wanted only to shoot his way
out of a trial, and a Chicago judge's mother and husband were executed
by a deranged man who was furious that she had dismissed a wild
lawsuit. It was sickening that an elected official would publicly offer
these sociopaths as examples of any democratic value, let alone as
holders of legitimate concerns about the judiciary.
The need to shield judges from
outside threats - including those from elected officials like Senator
Cornyn - is a priceless principle of our democracy. Senator Cornyn
offered a smarmy proclamation of "great distress" at courthouse
thuggery. Then he rationalized it with broadside accusations that
judges "make raw political or ideological decisions." He thumbed his
nose at the separation of powers, suggesting that the Supreme Court be
"an enforcer of political decisions made by elected representatives of
the people." Avoiding that nightmare is precisely why the founders made
federal judgeships lifetime jobs and created a nomination process that
requires presidents to seek bipartisan support.
Echoes of the political hijacking
of the Terri Schiavo case hung in the air as Mr. Cornyn spoke, just
days after the House majority leader, Tom DeLay, vengefully vowed that
"the time will come" to make the judges who resisted the Congressional
Republicans' gruesome deathbed intrusion "answer for their behavior."
Trying to intimidate judges used to be a crime, not a bombastic cudgel
for cynical politicians.
The public's hope must be that
Senator Cornyn's shameful outburst gives further pause to Senate
moderates about the threats of the majority leader, Senator Bill Frist,
to scrap the filibuster to ensure the confirmation of President Bush's
most extremist judicial nominees. Dr. Frist tried to distance himself
yesterday from Mr. DeLay's attack on the judiciary. But Dr. Frist must
carry the militants' baggage if he is ever to run for president, and he
complained yesterday of "a real fire lighted by Democrats around judges
over the last few days."
By Democrats? The senator should listen to what's being said on his side of the aisle, if he can bear it.
top
RSS feed
|