September 28, 2005
Moral Relativism Republican Style
Did I somehow miss the
outpouring of support for these two individuals (see below) emanating from the
moral bedrocks of the red states, the bullies in the pulpits, the entire
GOP, Faux News, The National Review, The Weekly Standard, all the
Cotton Mather-ites who climb upon their high holy rocking horses to
pronounce their special goodness while slaking their respective thirsts
for diamond mines. ladies and little boys, plus Phyllis Schlafly and
her fifth (or is it filth?) column of banshee-ites who get moist over the thought of Jesse Helms' manliness?
Now Rush
overlooking this duo, that I could understand that.. He was probably
out making a 'buy' when these stories broke, or at least instructing
his maid on what and how many 'vitamins' to purchase for him. Vice
President Dick Cheney, well he had 'other priorities at the time.'
President Bush was probably going mano-a-mano with a terrorist batch of
rogue tumbleweeds and couldn't be interrupted. Either that or he was on his
bike.
No, the great deafening silence from the self-described moral right for
Bunnatine Greenhouse and Captain Ian Fishback is typical. All these two
people wanted to do was their job. Do it to the best of their ability.
Do what they were hired to do--serve the American people. That's what
got them into trouble.
Bunnatine Greenhouse is the very model of who we want and need in government today
Army Contract Official Critical of Halliburton Pact Is Demoted
Erik Eckholm
New York Times
August 29, 2005
A top Army contracting official who criticized a large, noncompetitive contract with the Halliburton Company for work in Iraq was demoted Saturday for what the Army called poor job performance.
The official, Bunnatine H. Greenhouse, has worked in military
procurement for 20 years and for the past several years had been the
chief overseer of contracts at the Army Corps of Engineers, the agency
that has managed much of the reconstruction work in Iraq.
The demotion removes her from the elite Senior Executive Service and
reassigns her to a lesser job in the corps' civil works division.
Ms. Greenhouse's lawyer, Michael Kohn, called the action an "obvious
reprisal" for the strong objections she raised in 2003 to a series of
corps decisions involving the Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown
& Root, which has garnered more than $10 billion for work in Iraq.
Dick Cheney led Halliburton, which is based in Texas, before he became vice president.
"She is being demoted because of her strict adherence to procurement
requirements and the Army's preference to sidestep them when it suits
their needs," Mr. Kohn said Sunday in an interview. He also said the
Army had violated a commitment to delay Ms. Greenhouse's dismissal
until the completion of an inquiry by the Pentagon's inspector general.
Carol Sanders, spokeswoman for the Army Corps of Engineers, said
Sunday that the personnel action against Ms. Greenhouse had been
approved by the Department of the Army. And in a memorandum dated June
3, 2005, as the demotion was being arranged, the commander of the
corps, Lt. Gen. Carl A. Strock, said the administrative record "clearly
demonstrates that Ms. Greenhouse's removal from the S.E.S. is based on
her performance and not in retaliation for any disclosures of alleged
improprieties that she may have made."
Known as a stickler for the rules on competition, Ms. Greenhouse
initially received stellar performance ratings, Mr. Kohn said. But her
reviews became negative at roughly the time she began objecting to
decisions she saw as improperly favoring Kellogg Brown & Root, he
said. Often she hand-wrote her concerns on the contract documents, a
practice that corps leaders called unprofessional and confusing.
In October 2004, General Strock, citing two consecutive performance
reviews that called Ms. Greenhouse an uncooperative manager, informed
her that she would be demoted.
Ms. Greenhouse fought the demotion through official channels, and
publicly described her clashes with Corps of Engineers leaders over a
five-year, $7 billion oil-repair contract awarded to Kellogg Brown
& Root. She had argued that if urgency required a no-bid contract,
its duration should be brief.
Ms. Greenhouse had also fought the granting of a waiver to Kellogg
Brown & Root in December 2003, approving the high prices it had
paid for fuel imports for Iraq, and had objected to extending its
five-year contract for logistical support in the Balkans for 11 months
and $165 million without competitive bidding. In late June, ignoring
warnings from her superiors, Ms. Greenhouse appeared before a
Congressional panel, calling the Kellogg Brown & Root oil contract
"the most blatant and improper contract abuse I have witnessed during
the course of my professional career." She also said the defense
secretary's office had improperly interfered in the awarding of the
contract.
For the rest of the article, go here.
Captain Ian Fishback is the very model of who we want and need in the military today.
Officer's Road Led Him Outside Army
Capt. Ian Fishback repeatedly voiced his concern
about prisoner abuse in Iraq to his superiors, but felt he was being
brushed off.
Richard A. Serrano
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
September 25, 2005
WASHINGTON — When Army Capt. Ian Fishback told his
company and battalion commanders that soldiers were abusing Iraqi
prisoners in violation of the Geneva Convention, he says, they told him
those rules were easily skirted.
When he wrote a memo saying Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld was wrong in telling Congress that the Army follows
the Geneva dictates, his lieutenant colonel responded only: "I am aware
of Fishback's concerns."
And when Fishback found himself in the same room as
Secretary of the Army Francis J. Harvey at Ft. Benning, Ga., he again
complained about prisoner abuse. He said Harvey told him that
"corrective action was already taken."
At every turn, it seemed, the decorated young West
Point graduate, the son of a Vietnam War veteran from Michigan's Upper
Peninsula, whose wife is serving with the Army in Iraq, felt that the
military had shut him out.
So he turned to those he knows best. He sought
guidance from fellow infantry commanders and his West Point classmates,
and learned that they agreed with him that abuse of prisoners was
widespread and that officers weren't adequately trained in how to
handle them.
Then, in a lengthy chronology obtained Saturday by
The Times, recounting what he saw in Iraq and his numerous efforts to
get the Army's attention, he wrote that "Harvey is wrong." He wrote
that Army guidance was "too vague for officers to enforce American
values." He concluded that violations of the Geneva Convention were
"systematic, and the Army is misleading America."
This summer, after weighing the possible effects on
his career, he stepped outside the Army's chain of command and
telephoned the Human Rights Watch advocacy group. He later met with
aides on the Senate Armed Services Committee. On Friday, he authorized
them to make public his allegations, along with those of two sergeants,
of widespread prisoner abuse they had witnessed when they served in
Iraq in 2003 and 2004 as members of the Army's 82nd Airborne Division.
Within hours, the Army announced it had opened a criminal investigation.
The review is the first major investigation by the
military of widespread prisoner abuse outside the Abu Ghraib prison
scandal, and the first time such a review has targeted soldiers in the
regular Army rather than the National Guardsmen and reservists in the
Abu Ghraib case.
But for Fishback, whom friends describe as a deeply
religious Christian and patriot who prays before each meal and can
quote from the Constitution, the ordeal may be just beginning.
Army officials have temporarily furloughed him from
Special Operations training school at Ft. Bragg, N.C., to make him
available to the Criminal Investigation Command as it sorts through his
allegations.
For the rest of the article, go here.
Read more about Captain Fishback here.
I'm also certain (aren't you?) that the American Legion and the
Veterans of Foreign Wars organizations are rushing to aid Captain
Fishback.
Curiously (well, not really), Ronald Kessler's book titled: "A Matter of Character: Inside the White House of George W. Bush" has this listed under 'Book Description' on its Amazon.com page:
"...George W. Bush isn't the most articulate or scholarly president in
history, but he scores very high on the factors that count most:
character and leadership. President Bush has a more clearly defined
moral instinct, management style, and self-awareness than any other
recent president. And without question, President Bush is the
driving force behind his administration, not the pawn of anyone else.
In an age when politicians notoriously hem and haw while trying to
please everyone, he makes deft decisions very quickly. He is bolstered
by his strong Christian faith ..."
Now President Bush, campaigning in 2000, issued this declaration:
"...I will restore honor and integrity to the White House..."
Okay, have at it George. We're waiting...and waiting...and waiting...as is your self-proclaimed Lord and Savior.
So are Bunnatine Greenhouse and Captain Ian Fishback.
top
RSS feed
|