November 26, 2007
We have thoughts and ideas
Say,
how about we locate the $9 billion missing in Iraq so that such can be
used for the care of our ill veterans? Or, when Bush-evik says
the next time that the Pentagon is running out of funds, how about
someone in the media circus asking him where the $9 billion went and
when he will have it back?
Okay, I'm being mean, too partisan, not conciliatory enough,
contributing to the incivility in this country, blah, blah,
blah... Is my behavior somehow worse ot more far-reaching than
this:
How do you fund a war but not the casualities
Michael Isikoff and Jamie Reno
NEWSWEEK
Oct 29, 2007 Issue
Yet a Pentagon task force recently
concluded that the number of mental-health professionals available to
vets is "woefully inadequate," and the average wait time for disability
claims is six months. Linda Bilmes, a policy analyst at Harvard who
will testify before Congress this week, calculates that over the next
decade, the disability costs for vets will be at least $60 billion—more
than six times the administration's official projections. The numbers
coming out of government budget offices, she says, "are significantly
underestimating the reality." All this has angered some vets and their
families. "I would love to have the president live my life for one week
to see how difficult it is," says Annette McLeod, wife of Army
specialist Wendell McLeod, who is suffering from PTSD after serving in
Iraq. "How do you fund a war but not fund the casualties?"
Yep, Commander Codpiece can wrap his arms around his "fantastic Freedom Institute"
-- hey, free tickets and a bus ride with George's favorite iPod
playlist booming out of the loudspeakers, but only if you call and sign
up right now -- and pick up some filthy lucre giving speeches to "replenish the ol’ coffers” but let the vets suffer in distress and neglect.
W would also rather keep hedge fund managers
and the like accustomed to their hard-earned, fantabulous lifestyle
rather than taxing the obscene money amounts being gorged on by these
parasites who contribute zero to the national economy and our country's
well-being. Them's some values. Think about it: the janitors on Wall
Street are taxed at a higher rate than hedge fund managers and George
(Jesus is my favorite political philosopher) Bush thinks that prettier
than looking at a pile of brush after he has chainsawed it into
submission.
Joseph Galloway wrote another commentary recently that summed up the
perversions (his word and a fine choice) of the last seven years.
Commentary: Good riddance to them all
Joseph L. Galloway | McClatchy Newspapers
November 21, 2007
...What we've witnessed and
endured during seven long years of the Bush presidency is the
inevitable consequence of bringing vicious and unprincipled but
successful political campaigners — attack dogs — into top White House
jobs.
The idea that a political campaign
should address any and all criticism by going for the throats of those
who dare to question it may work on election day but it doesn’t work,
or shouldn’t, when the full weight and power of the federal government
is put behind it.
We are a better people and this is
a better country than that, and this is why, when it's weighed and
judged, the Bush presidency will be found to have perverted not only
our system but also the very principles on which our nation was
founded...
...We are a better people and this
is a better country than that, and this is why, when it's weighed and
judged, the Bush presidency will be found to have perverted not only
our system but also the very principles on which our nation was founded.
We don’t rush into a war that has
cost so many lives and so much national treasure, and has so damaged
our standing in the world, based on a tissue of lies. But under the
leadership of George W. Bush, that's what we did in Iraq.
We don’t stand idly by, backs
turned and eyes closed, while in wartime our friends and political
contributors loot the national treasury of billions of taxpayer
dollars. But the Bush administration and a Republican-controlled
Congress did just that.
We don’t send our soldiers and
Marines into combat without enough of everything they need to fight,
survive and win. But that's what this administration and its political
operatives in charge of the Pentagon did.
We don’t turn the office of the
attorney general and key parts of the Justice Department into a branch
of a partisan political campaign — gutting offices charged with
protecting the civil rights of minorities and directing the prosecution
of those of a different political party — but this administration did.
We don’t declare war and then
expect that the entire sacrifice will be borne by the half a percent of
our population who wear uniforms. We don’t fight a long and costly war
by cutting taxes on the wealthiest Americans and borrowing trillions of
dollars to finance it from foreign competitors such as China. But this
administration did.
We don’t prosecute a war to spread
democracy by curtailing democracy and suspending the Bill of Rights at
home. We cannot promote our principles abroad by denying the same
principles — the right to a lawyer, the right to a fair trial, the
right to be secure in our homes — to ourselves. But this administration
did.
We don’t beat or torture
confessions out of prisoners in violation of our laws and the laws of
the civilized world. We don’t lock people up and hold them
incommunicado for years without charges or trials. But this
administration did and does.
We don’t applaud and cheer an
administration and a Congress that make the rich vastly richer, the
middle class less secure and the poor even poorer. But this
administration has done just that, in violation of our principles and
the principles of love, peace and charity that are engrained in the
Christianity that these rogues and charlatans embrace so publicly but
violate every day.
Go here for the complete article.
And then Karl Rove gets a gig writing for NEWSWEEK, after TIME
apparently said 'thanks but no thanks.' In the interest of
honesty -- jeez, what a concept -- Markos Moulitsas, founder of the
DailyKos web site has also been hired for 'balance.' Let us make our
case very clear: If NEWSWEEK wished to have a balanced approach, then
why not hire any of the innumerable conservative/radical rightwingers
who blog rather than someone who lied to a United States Special
Prosecutor on a matter of national security and has a history of political sleaziness
-- smearing opponents with pedophile charges, with setting up a
listening device in one's own office and charging that it had to be the
work of a political opponent, etc. But, no, what a catch! Jon Meacham
really needs to have a heart-to-heart with himself. We would love to
hear his justification.
If you want to understand how Karl Rove has so infected the body politic then read Joshua Green's article in The Atlantic.
Let's close with this endearing tidbit from a recent article in Harpers Magazine:
"...Says former German
chancellor Helmut Schmidt, a man close to Bush's father and to Henry
Kissinger, in a recent interview with Die Zeit, given the choice
between Russia's Vladimir Putin and George W. Bush, he'll opt for the
man in the Kremlin. Bush 43 is just "too dangerous..."
RSS feed
|