I Cogitate

Recent Posts My Best Blogs Archives Favorite Quotes Links Contact
November 26, 2007

We have thoughts and ideas

Say, how about we locate the $9 billion missing in Iraq so that such can be used for the care of our ill veterans?  Or, when Bush-evik says the next time that the Pentagon is running out of funds, how about someone in the media circus asking him where the $9 billion went and when he will have it back?

Okay, I'm being mean, too partisan, not conciliatory enough, contributing to the incivility in this country, blah, blah, blah...  Is my behavior somehow worse ot more far-reaching than this:
How do you fund a war but not the casualities
Michael Isikoff and Jamie Reno
NEWSWEEK
Oct 29, 2007 Issue

Yet a Pentagon task force recently concluded that the number of mental-health professionals available to vets is "woefully inadequate," and the average wait time for disability claims is six months. Linda Bilmes, a policy analyst at Harvard who will testify before Congress this week, calculates that over the next decade, the disability costs for vets will be at least $60 billion—more than six times the administration's official projections. The numbers coming out of government budget offices, she says, "are significantly underestimating the reality." All this has angered some vets and their families. "I would love to have the president live my life for one week to see how difficult it is," says Annette McLeod, wife of Army specialist Wendell McLeod, who is suffering from PTSD after serving in Iraq. "How do you fund a war but not fund the casualties?"

Yep, Commander Codpiece can wrap his arms around his "fantastic Freedom Institute" -- hey, free tickets and a bus ride with George's favorite iPod playlist booming out of the loudspeakers, but only if you call and sign up right now -- and pick up some filthy lucre giving speeches to "replenish the ol’ coffers” but let the vets suffer in distress and neglect.

W would also rather keep hedge fund managers and the like accustomed to their hard-earned, fantabulous lifestyle rather than taxing the obscene money amounts being gorged on by these parasites who contribute zero to the national economy and our country's well-being. Them's some values. Think about it: the janitors on Wall Street are taxed at a higher rate than hedge fund managers and George (Jesus is my favorite political philosopher) Bush thinks that prettier than looking at a pile of brush after he has chainsawed it into submission.

Joseph Galloway wrote another commentary recently that summed up the perversions (his word and a fine choice) of the last seven years.
Commentary: Good riddance to them all
Joseph L. Galloway | McClatchy Newspapers
November 21, 2007


...What we've witnessed and endured during seven long years of the Bush presidency is the inevitable consequence of bringing vicious and unprincipled but successful political campaigners — attack dogs — into top White House jobs.

The idea that a political campaign should address any and all criticism by going for the throats of those who dare to question it may work on election day but it doesn’t work, or shouldn’t, when the full weight and power of the federal government is put behind it.

We are a better people and this is a better country than that, and this is why, when it's weighed and judged, the Bush presidency will be found to have perverted not only our system but also the very principles on which our nation was founded...

...We are a better people and this is a better country than that, and this is why, when it's weighed and judged, the Bush presidency will be found to have perverted not only our system but also the very principles on which our nation was founded.

We don’t rush into a war that has cost so many lives and so much national treasure, and has so damaged our standing in the world, based on a tissue of lies. But under the leadership of George W. Bush, that's what we did in Iraq.

We don’t stand idly by, backs turned and eyes closed, while in wartime our friends and political contributors loot the national treasury of billions of taxpayer dollars. But the Bush administration and a Republican-controlled Congress did just that.

We don’t send our soldiers and Marines into combat without enough of everything they need to fight, survive and win. But that's what this administration and its political operatives in charge of the Pentagon did.

We don’t turn the office of the attorney general and key parts of the Justice Department into a branch of a partisan political campaign — gutting offices charged with protecting the civil rights of minorities and directing the prosecution of those of a different political party — but this administration did.

We don’t declare war and then expect that the entire sacrifice will be borne by the half a percent of our population who wear uniforms. We don’t fight a long and costly war by cutting taxes on the wealthiest Americans and borrowing trillions of dollars to finance it from foreign competitors such as China. But this administration did.

We don’t prosecute a war to spread democracy by curtailing democracy and suspending the Bill of Rights at home. We cannot promote our principles abroad by denying the same principles — the right to a lawyer, the right to a fair trial, the right to be secure in our homes — to ourselves. But this administration did.

We don’t beat or torture confessions out of prisoners in violation of our laws and the laws of the civilized world. We don’t lock people up and hold them incommunicado for years without charges or trials. But this administration did and does.

We don’t applaud and cheer an administration and a Congress that make the rich vastly richer, the middle class less secure and the poor even poorer. But this administration has done just that, in violation of our principles and the principles of love, peace and charity that are engrained in the Christianity that these rogues and charlatans embrace so publicly but violate every day.
Go here for the complete article.
 
And then Karl Rove gets a gig writing for NEWSWEEK, after TIME apparently said 'thanks but no thanks.' In the interest of  honesty -- jeez, what a concept -- Markos Moulitsas, founder of the DailyKos web site has also been hired for 'balance.' Let us make our case very clear: If NEWSWEEK wished to have a balanced approach, then why not hire any of the innumerable conservative/radical rightwingers who blog rather than someone who lied to a United States Special Prosecutor on a matter of national security and has a history of political sleaziness -- smearing opponents with pedophile charges, with setting up a listening device in one's own office and charging that it had to be the work of a political opponent, etc. But, no, what a catch! Jon Meacham really needs to have a heart-to-heart with himself. We would love to hear his justification.

If you want to understand how Karl Rove has so infected the body politic then read Joshua Green's article in The Atlantic.

Let's close with this endearing tidbit from a recent article in Harpers Magazine:
"...Says former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt, a man close to Bush's father and to Henry Kissinger, in a recent interview with Die Zeit, given the choice between Russia's Vladimir Putin and George W. Bush, he'll opt for the man in the Kremlin. Bush 43 is just "too dangerous..."
RSS feed link RSS feed

Recent Posts My Best Blogs Archives Favorite Quotes Links Contact