January 11, 2007
Phillip Adams --- a must read
Continuing this week's feature of
writers/reporters you may not be familiar with but should, here's a
treat from Australia's artistic
Renaissance man, Phillip Adams. The writing here doesn't get much
better. 'Nuff written, get on with it.
Crash of civilised values in Cuba After celebrating the birth of Christ, we should reflect on the death of decency, writes
Phillip Adams The Australian December 26, 2006
Due south of the Florida
Keys, Cuba arcs 1300km across the Caribbean, looking for all the world
like a hammerhead shark or a raised eyebrow. At one end of the island,
Fidel Castro is dying. At the other, David Hicks is being driven insane.
A lot of symbolism for a
small country and two men. Cuba, home to the missile crisis and the Bay
of Pigs fiasco and the CIA's botched attempts at Castro's
assassination, its capital the setting for Graham Greene's satire on
the Cold War, Our Man in Havana. And Castro's final breaths in Havana
will be close to the last gasps of communism.
And Hicks? Our man in
Guantanamo? With the war on terror replacing the Cold War, the
treatment of Hicks embodies the worst aspects of the Bush
administration and the conga line of suckholes who support it.
One hopes that John
Howard, Philip Ruddock and Alexander Downer enjoyed their Christmas
dinners -- an occasion which, I understand, celebrates the birth of
Christ as well as the triumphs of retailing. Presumably the Christian
jailers of Muslim prisoners at Guantanamo had turkey and pud, too, and
you can bet there were some macabre Chrissie decorations about the
place. Tinsel and Santas to go with the carols, Rudolph and I'm
Dreaming of a White Christmas. Talk about the clash of civilisations.
Hicks has had five years
in and out of wire cages and solitary confinement, John. That's 60
months, Philip. Or more than 1800 days, Alexander. Though treated as
cruelly as any criminal on earth, Hicks has never been formally charged
-- let alone convicted -- of anything. And his term of imprisonment
shows no sign of ending. Best estimate? Another two years before Hicks
has his day in some parody of a court. But we can't bring him back
here, can we, gentlemen? Because there's no appropriate crime on the
Australian statutes with which to charge him. So Australia remains
complicit in a gross breach of human rights, not to mention ethics,
morality and common decency.
Though it's an old and
some would argue proud tradition, I'm not wildly enthusiastic about
Australians going off to other people's wars, to conflicts that aren't
our business. That applies to prime ministers putting Australians in
harm's way in Vietnam or Iraq. Or to Australian Serbs or Croats who
headed to Yugoslavia to help with ethnic cleansing, or to Australian
Jews volunteering for active duty in Israel. So I'm hardly going to
endorse Hicks's adventurism in Afghanistan.
In the long run it isn't
Hicks's rights we should be defending; it's my rights and your rights
and the rights of other Australian kids who may be swept up in some
mutated form of idealism or religious enthusiasm. We've got standards
to maintain: Australian standards of justice. Instead, we're in bed
with a government that rips up its constitution in regards to the civil
rights of its citizens, that allowed the horrors of Abu Ghraib, that
abandoned the Geneva Conventions, legitimised torture, adopted the
obscene policy of rendition and created the hell holes known as black
sites. And, along the way, Guantanamo.
It's a long list of
atrocities committed under the imprimatur of the war on terror, cashing
the blank cheque of 9/11, ranging from that dramatic erosion of civil
rights within the US to the conduct and consequences of the Iraq war.
In this scheme of things, the maltreatment of Hicks may seem utterly
trivial. But it goes to the heart -- apparently the dead heart -- of
Australia's democratic and legal traditions. Even the British Prime
Minister, a greater Bush suckhole than ours, found the Guantanamo
situation intolerable and brought the British prisoners home, where no
charges have been laid because no British law had been broken. This may
be something of a political embarrassment for a card-carrying member of
the coalition of the willing. Yet on this single issue Blair and co are
to be congratulated for showing Howard, Ruddock and Downer how to
behave. Shame, gentlemen, shame.
Go here to read the rest.
Here's a link to a brief Phillip Adams biography.
top
RSS feed
|