January 19, 2007
Psychological entrapment and Iraq
Rational thinking hasn't exactly
been the sparkling trademark of the Bush Administration. If asked how
to best define Bush & Company to date, and you offered 'bullying
and thuggery,' well, you've just won two tickets to the Billy Orally
Show, plus a private demonstration of Bill with his companion of
choice, his loofah. No. no, I wouldn't inflict such a punishment on my
worst adversary, let alone someone who 'gets' the motif of the
Bush-aholics.
In the following, psychologist Scott Plous presents some
intriguing
information, something of value as this nation debates
the next step in the Iraq quagmire.
The psychological entrapment of
George Bush, along with his desperate need for a positive lasting
legacy, something that equals or tops his father, plus Bush's peculiar
brand of self-hatred and incompleteness, unfortunately makes George
Bush and Iraq our nation's problem, one that we sadly must solve
because he is incapable of doing so. Out of Iraq and out with Bush, one way or another and sooner rather than later.
Iraq and the Danger of Psychological Entrapment
By Shankar Vedantam The Washington Post Monday, December 4, 2006; A02
As Robert M. Gates appears
this week at his Senate confirmation hearings for defense secretary,
Wesleyan University psychologist Scott Plous sees a hidden trap. To
understand it, take a little test.
Let's say your elderly dad
has a beloved car. Its reliability was legendary, but it has started to
have problems. He gets one thing fixed, and something else goes wrong.
Each fix doesn't cost much, but they add up, and then the problems
start to get bigger. Your dad is convinced the next repair will get the
car as good as new. Would you advise him to pull the plug and get rid
of the car?
Or consider this. A friend
invests some money after getting a tip about a stock. The price soars,
and your friend gains 10 percent overnight. He immediately doubles his
investment. A week later, the thing tanks, and he is in the red. A
month later, it dives again, and he has lost a quarter of his
investment. Should he cut his losses and sell?
One more, and yes, these
are all trick questions. A woman you care about falls in love. After
many years of a happy relationship, the person she is with develops a
vicious streak, starts smashing things and occasionally gives her a
black eye. Would you tell her to walk out of the relationship?
The trick in all these
questions is that when presented with such scenarios, it is easy for us
to answer yes. Your dad should sell that car, your friend should save
what money he can, and the person you care about should dump that
abuser.
Every day, of course, when it comes to such decisions in our own lives, millions of people answer no.
The difference is because
of a widespread phenomenon in human behavior known as entrapment. When
you invest yourself in something, it is exceedingly difficult to
discard your investment. What is devilish about entrapment is not just
that it can result in ever greater losses, but that those losses get
you ever more entrapped, because now you have even more invested.
Plous, a social
psychologist and author of "The Psychology of Judgment and Decision
Making," said experiments show that psychological entrapment comes in
at least four guises: the investment trap, in which we try to recover
sunk costs by throwing good money after bad; the time delay trap, in
which a short-term benefit carries the seed of long-term problems; the
deterioration trap, in which things that started out well slowly get
worse; and the ignorance trap, in which hidden risks surface suddenly.
Go here to read the rest.
top
RSS feed
|