January 16, 2007
Review of "Imperial Life in the Emerald City"
Having just finished reading "Imperial Life in the Emerald City" by Rajiv Chandrasekaran, here's what struck me the most:
Viceroy Paul Bremer,
his top pr flack Dan Senor, Doug Feith and former (present?) Rudy
Guilani gorilla Bernard Kerik take it on the chin the most. Especially
Bremer.
On page 32. it's noted
that Doug Feith never gave Jay Garner, the first Coalition Provional
Authority (CPA) leader, any formalized plans for reconstruction, for
rebuilding the country because the underlying assumption was that the
Iraqi civil servants would return and Pentagon/neo-con fave Ahmed
Chalabi would simply be in charge and rule Iraq.
On page 33, Donald
Rumsfeld wanted to pick Jay Garner's chiefs at ORHA (the Office of
Reconstruction & Humanitarian Assistance)---rather than Garner.
Rumsfeld also blocked State Department members from joining ORHA
because they weren't trustworthy enough.
On page 34, the
first sentence of Garner's own post-hostilities-in-Iraq plan was:
"History will judge the war against Iraq not by the brilliance of its
military execution, but by the effectiveness of the post-hostilities
activities."
On page 35, Michael Mobbs,
Doug Feith's former law partner and a Richard Perle acolyte, was hired
to be the Iraq civil administrator--Garner sent him back to Washington
D.C. a week after arriving in Baghdad because of Mobbs' incompetency.
The State Department's
Future of Iraq Project totaled 2,500 pages--not that anyone bothered to
read it, let alone implement any suggestions.
Dick Cheney blocked
Warrick Thomas, who was heavily involved in the Future of Iraq Project,
from assisting in Iraq because Thomas despised Ahmed Chalabi. Donald
Rumsfled made the call to Jay Garner telling Garner that Thomas was not
acceptable. Thomas worked in the State Department.
On page 41, ORHA planned
security for Iraq central bank, the National Museum and other sites,
with the Oil Ministry ranked last. But the military didn't inform the
ground commanders so this plan was never implemented.
Looting caused more damage to Iraq's infrastructure than the U.S. bombing did.
On page 52, Jay Garner is
quoted: "I never knew what their (Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Feith) plans
were but I did know that what I believed and what their plans were,
were probably two different things."
The internal Iraqi power players didn't want the exiles to be in charge and certainly not Ahmed Chalabi.
A Paul Bremer quote: "As long as we are here, we are the occupying power...it's an ugly word, but it's true."
De-Baathification was
Bremer's choice, with no questions allowed. When informed of this, Jay
Garner told Bremer: "You're going to drive 50,000 Baathists underground
before nightfall. Don't do this."
The American individual
appointed to be in charge of five Iraqi ministries is quoted: "If you
send them home (all the Baathists), the CPA would have a major problem
running most ministries" but Bremer responded that the subject was not
open for discussion.
After the
de-Baathification orders were implemented, Bremer said teacher appeals
would be heard by an Iraqi-led commission--one headed by Ahmed Chalabi,
who was described as using de-Baathification as a means of getting even
with adversaries. 10 to 15 thousand teachers were fired as a result,
which decimated Sunni schools.
Further Paul Bremer on
de-Baathification: "It's the single most important thing we've done
here and it's the most popular thing."
The neo-con expectation
was that the regular Iraqi Army would stay at their bases even though
leaflets had been dropped telling them to go home to their families and
wait for news. They went home and the military bases were then
looted until threadbare. Later, the soliders protested about the loss
of their jobs. Afterwards, someone in the CPA asked: "what happened to
the protestors?" The response was: "They're all insurgents now."
For Paul Bremer, taking action, even in the fog of war, was the preference.
Paul Bremer terribly
underestimated Ayatollah Sistani's political and religious clout and
Sistani clearly out-maneuvered Bremer in the runup to determining how
elections and the like would be handled.
A vast majority of the
advisory staff in the Green Zone were there because of allegiance to
George Bush and the Republican Party. Financial contributors and those
having other connections were the chosen. Aadherence to Bush's vision
for Iraq was mandatory. Those uncertain about Bush's vision were
rejected. Also, key hiring questions were an applicant's stance on Roe
v. Wade and which presidnetial candidate did you vote for in the last
election? An attempt to headhunt was shut down by those in
D>C>despite Bremer's pleas for bodies to fill positions. A
galvanizing example: Bremer's budget chief asked to be sent ten go-fers
so a search was made, primarily focused on entry level Heritage
Foundation job applicants. After ten were hired, six were then assigned
to manage Iraq's 13 billion dollar budget although none had any
previous financial experience. The CPA was for Bush zealots--similar to
a cult.
Three staffers were hired
to privatize Iraqi industries. Three! And these industries had no
records, no accounts, nothing. Saddam had set up the industries as
patronage jobs for Sunnis, for Sunni full employment, regardless of
whether or not people actually showed up for work.
A private contractor,
Custer Battles LLC, billed the CPA for close to $10 million in 'costs'
when its real figure was $3.7 million. Custer Battles, basically a
startup company in conjunction with the invasion of Iraq, won the
contract because they said they could accomplish what was needed the
quickest--that was the sole measuring point for awarding the contract.
Bernie Kerik is quoted as
saying: "I can't afford to be here (in Iraq)" because he could get
$10,000 a pop for speaking engagements at home. He was a partner in
Rudy Guilani's consulting firm and was supposedly there In Iraq) to
improve the public image of the good work of the Iraqi police. He
repeatedly bullshitted the media that things are getting better on
security.
The book offers that what
was needed was a chief executive type working on getting funding, not a
street cop like Kerik. Kerik held two staff meetings the whole time he
was there, which totaled three months. Kerik was described as like an
urban cowboy, who preferred going out on raids in the middle of the
night rathering than doing any administering. He was vetted by Bush and
Bush liked his persona. Again, competence and planning ability were not
prerequisites--just likeability.
Kerik self-described his time in Iraq: "I was in my own world. I did my own thing."
Dan Senor, Bremer's right
hand man, is depicted as uber-partisan, not interested in truth or
reality. For him, reality was what he said it was.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
My comment: George (failure is my middle name) Bush needed
to lead but leading requires being informed so as to make appropriate
decisions. Gut level 'leadership' in and of itself, is just laziness.
Bush has been like Nero--Iraq burns up while he facilitates hearing
nothing but good news. Mission Iraq was akin to Karl Rove's political
campaigns---truth, reality, reason or any semblance of moral conduct
were and are but hindrances and therefore, unnecessary and best to be
avoided. This hasn't been an administration per se--it's a cult.
Those who fail to believe and join and those who see the truth and thus
depart are threatened and demonized. Sound familiar? In
this book, there are uncountable instances of abject criminal
misconduct and willful dereliction of duty throughout the Bush
Administration. I challenge anyone to read the various recent books on
and about the handling of Iraq and still actually believe we weren't
deliberately lied to and led astray--that a large number of
Bush-aholics should immediately resign, including the President and
Vice President.
top
RSS feed
|