January 10, 2007
Robert Fisk on the Saddam, Blair and Bush nexus
Continuing
our feature this week of excellent writers/reporters -- Robert
Fisk has his admirers and detractors--nobody seems to be indifferent
towards his reporting. Here he avails to his readers past events and
context surrounding the lynching of Saddam Hussein, something far too
many U.S.
publications demur from providing. Although many would label Fisk a
leftist, he calls hypocrisy on all sides. Who is considered 'good' and
who is 'bad' is
unfortunately quite often a simplistic, incomplete and
attempt-at-political-advantage labeling. Such spin and mythmaking is
exposed in
the following.
A Dictator Created Then Destroyed by America
Robert Fisk
The Independent UK
30 December2006
Saddam
to the gallows. It was an easy equation. Who could be more deserving of
that last walk to the scaffold - that crack of the neck at the end of a
rope - than the Beast of Baghdad, the Hitler of the Tigris, the man who
murdered untold hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis while spraying
chemical weapons over his enemies? Our masters will tell us in a few
hours that it is a "great day" for Iraqis and will hope that the Muslim
world will forget that his death sentence was signed - by the Iraqi
"government", but on behalf of the Americans - on the very eve of the
Eid al-Adha, the Feast of the Sacrifice, the moment of greatest
forgiveness in the Arab world.
But
history will record that the Arabs and other Muslims and, indeed, many
millions in the West, will ask another question this weekend, a
question that will not be posed in other Western newspapers because it
is not the narrative laid down for us by our presidents and prime
ministers - what about the other guilty men?
No, Tony
Blair is not Saddam. We don't gas our enemies. George W Bush is not
Saddam. He didn't invade Iran or Kuwait. He only invaded Iraq. But
hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians are dead - and thousands of
Western troops are dead - because Messrs Bush and Blair and the Spanish
Prime Minister and the Italian Prime Minister and the Australian Prime
Minister went to war in 2003 on a potage of lies and mendacity and,
given the weapons we used, with great brutality.
In the
aftermath of the international crimes against humanity of 2001 we have
tortured, we have murdered, we have brutalised and killed the innocent
- we have even added our shame at Abu Ghraib to Saddam's shame at Abu
Ghraib - and yet we are supposed to forget these terrible crimes as we
applaud the swinging corpse of the dictator we created.
Who
encouraged Saddam to invade Iran in 1980, which was the greatest war
crime he has committed for it led to the deaths of a million and a half
souls? And who sold him the components for the chemical weapons with
which he drenched Iran and the Kurds? We did. No wonder the Americans,
who controlled Saddam's weird trial, forbad any mention of this, his
most obscene atrocity, in the charges against him. Could he not have
been handed over to the Iranians for sentencing for this massive war
crime? Of course not. Because that would also expose our culpability.
Go here to read the rest.
top
RSS feed
|