I Cogitate

Recent Posts My Best Blogs Archives Favorite Quotes Links Contact
May 4, 2005

Rolling Stone Flattens Bush

Yes, the subterfuge quotient grows more obese on a daily basis for Bush Incorporated as, in the re-do spirit so popular in today's media, George Bush continues in his fifth year of performance artistry with a makeover of the democratic traditions in this country that he, and only he, gets to decide are roadblocks slowing his crusade.

He is at it yet again in attempting another act of duplicity (how many is that or have you lost count?) with the submission of the annual federal budget spending plan.
Did anyone ask him for the latest maneuver? Well, let's just call it his little surprise gift to the nation. A token of his affection.

Credit writer Osha Gray Davidson for this discovery in an April 21, 2005 article on-line at Rolling Stone:
Bush's Most Radical Plan Yet
With a vote of hand-picked lobbyists, the president could terminate any federal agency he dislikes
Osha Gray Davidson

If you've got something to hide in Washington, the best place to bury it is in the federal budget. The spending plan that President Bush submitted to Congress this year contains 2,000 pages that outline funding to safeguard the environment, protect workers from injury and death, crack down on securities fraud and ensure the safety of prescription drugs. But almost unnoticed in the budget, tucked away in a single paragraph, is a provision that could make every one of those protections a thing of the past.

The proposal, spelled out in three short sentences, would give the president the power to appoint an eight-member panel called the "Sunset Commission," which would systematically review federal programs every ten years and decide whether they should be eliminated. Any programs that are not "producing results," in the eyes of the commission, would "automatically terminate unless the Congress took action to continue them."

The administration portrays the commission as a well-intentioned effort to make sure that federal agencies are actually doing their job. "We just think it makes sense," says Clay Johnson, deputy director for management at the Office of Management and Budget, which crafted the provision. "The goal isn't to get rid of a program -- it's to make it work better."

In practice, however, the commission would enable the Bush administration to achieve what Ronald Reagan only dreamed of: the end of government regulation as we know it. With a simple vote of five commissioners -- many of them likely to be lobbyists and executives from major corporations currently subject to federal oversight -- the president could terminate any program or agency he dislikes. No more Environmental Protection Agency. No more Food and Drug Administration. No more Securities and Exchange Commission...

Read the rest here.

Imagine what we would be confronting if, instead of Jesus changing George Bush's heart, it was King Herod or Pontius Pilate? That's not a pretty picture. Hey, wait a minute, George IS acting like Herod and Pilate.

Long-time habits must be hard to break.

The 'straight-talking, no nuance' sheen of this presidential administration becomes transparently false with these continuing episodes of clandestine chicanery.


What was one of the tenets (thankfully not George) our parents stressed to us when we were growing up? Be careful who you pal around with--they didn't want us unduly influenced by less-than-upstanding individuals.

So, then how do the Democrats work with these tricksters? How do you build a working relationship with shysters? These four-flushers stop at nothing while propagating an end-justifies-the-means morality.

The tenuous, at best, connection Bush and Company have with truth, sincerity and openness is stretched beyond the breaking point.

So much so, that every encounter with them leaves one checking for wallet, conscience and heart, not necessarily in that order..

I have a better idea: President Bush, let's IMPORT democracy to the United States. Be upfront. Try honest and straightforward. Drop the deviousness. I f you strongly believe in something, then take a stand. Not soldiers employed by you. Not your hacks and lackeys to deflect fire. You.

Come on George, in language you will surely understand, you're either with us or against us.

top

RSS feed link RSS feed

Recent Posts My Best Blogs Archives Favorite Quotes Links Contact