September 26, 2007
Kudos to David Shuster and Keith Olbermann
UPDATE: The GOP didn't take
kindly to David Shuster not rolling over and allowing the usual banal
delivery of Republican talking points du jour. Objections were raised
on the basis of the deceased soldier seemingly not residing in Rep.
Marsha Blackburn's district and Shuster not remaining 'in the box' with
the so-called discussion. NBC's Dan Abrams caved prior to a clear
determination of this matter. Would Abrams have insisted that Shuster
apologize for allowing Blackburn to offer her pre-determined blather
and not offering another side -- a critical point -- to the discussion?
Hardly. Corporate money talks yet again, triumphing over fact. Now the
GOP is apparently boycotting any further television involvement with
Shuster. We say let 'em buy televison time if they wish to give a
speech and yes, the same applies to the Democrats.
Blackburn's TV tiff gets spotlighted
Representative was asked if she knew name of dead soldier
Bartholomew Sullivan
Memphis Commercial Appeal
September 28, 2007
WASHINGTON -- A recent television
interview with U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., has exploded in the
blogosphere as pundits debate which is worse: that Blackburn couldn't
name the last soldier killed in her district or that the interviewer
might have gotten that name wrong.
Hot Air, Flopping Aces, Conservative Belle,
Media Blog, The American Pundit, Red State, crooksandliars and The
Corner on National Review Online, among others, have all weighed in on
what most are calling MSNBC host David Shuster's "gotcha!" admission
from Blackburn Monday night.
When Shuster asked her the name of the
soldier, Blackburn paused, then said: "The name of the last soldier
killed in Iraq from my district? I do not know."
Blackburn had come on the show of reliably
conservative host Tucker Carlson to talk about the controversial
MoveOn.org advertisement in The New York Times. But guest host Shuster
turned the tables on her with what many conservative bloggers consider
an unfair question.
Shuster followed up by saying that the
soldier's name was Jeremy S. Bohannon, 18. Bohannon died in Baghdad in
early August, less than a month after arriving, Tennessee's youngest
casualty of the war. On Wednesday night, Shuster was forced to read a
correction on the air saying that Bohannon was from a neighboring
congressional district.
For many liberal bloggers, the fact Blackburn
couldn't name the soldier, but knew all about the discounted rate
charged to MoveOn.org for its "General Betray Us" full-page ad in The
Times, showed skewed priorities.
Others found Shuster's error unpardonable.
But Shuster's apology may have been
premature. The tiny hamlet of Bon Aqua, Tenn., is where Bohannon lived
in the months immediately prior to entering the Army. The Census Bureau
places his home in Blackburn's 7th Congressional District.
He lived in Bon Aqua for "close to a year"
immediately prior to entering the Army, said Tonya Taylor, 35, who
permitted him to stay at her house while Bohannon was dating her
daughter.
Bohannon grew up, was home-schooled and was
buried in McEwan, which is clearly in the 8th Congressional District of
U.S. Rep. John Tanner, D-Tenn. But his last legal address was in
Blackburn's district.
David Shuster filled in for Tucker Carlson on Monday and
asked a simple question (one that Carlson would never has asked) to a
Congresswoman who was all riled up about the newspaper ad 'attack' on
General David Petraeus. She was prepped and primed with her talking
points but not about a more important matter, a constituent soldier's
death. Them GOPers sure have interesting priorities:
SHUSTER:
The Republican outcry is beginning to die down over that MoveOn ad, the
one running in the “New York Times” that posed the question -- General
Petraeus or General Betray Us? But there‘s a bigger question left
unanswered, a question of hypocrisy when it comes to political
attack. Where was the outrage when Rush Limbaugh said this about
Republican Senator Chuck Hagel over one of the senator‘s stances on
Iraq? Limbaugh said, “by the way, we had a caller call, couldn‘t
stay on the air, got a new name for Senator Hagel of Nebraska. We
got General Petraeus and Senator Betray-Us, new name for Senator
Hagel.”
Here to discuss all this is
Marsha Blackburn, a Republican Congresswoman from Tennessee.
Congresswoman, thanks for coming in.
REP. MARSHA BLACKBURN ®, TENNESSEE: Good to be with you.
SHUSTER: Do you want to take this opportunity to condemn what Rush Limbaugh said about Chuck Hagel?
BLACKBURN: What I want to do is talk about the “New York Times.” Probably, Rush Limbaugh could have gotten by without saying that.
SHUSTER: Could of gotten by? It was wrong, wasn‘t it?
BLACKBURN: He was referencing what a caller said.
SHUSTER: But it was wrong for a caller or for Rush Limbaugh to call Chuck Hagel Senator Betray Us, right?
BLACKBURN: But Rush Limbaugh did not go in and buy an ad and place it with the “New York Times” and get a special, preferred rate—
SHUSTER: So there‘s
a difference between buying an ad in the “New York Times” and Rush
Limbaugh hearing something that he likes to hear from one of his
viewers and repeating it on the air. What‘s the distinction?
BLACKBURN: Rush
Limbaugh should not have done that. But Rush Limbaugh did not go
out and buy an ad and circumvent the “New York Times.” It takes
two weeks for them to tell the truth on this and we find out that they
did get a favored rate.
SHUSTER:
They didn‘t know they got a favored rate. As soon as they
found out they got a favored rate, they wrote a check.
BLACKBURN: I don‘t believe that. I think they did—
SHUSTER: I understand that this is an issue that—You‘re very concerned, of course, about the MoveOn ad, is that right?
BLACKBURN:
Everybody is concerned about the MoveOn ad. Everybody is
concerned about what seems to be the violation of the public trust by
the “New York Times.” Look, we all know that their circulation is
down, that their stock is down, that they—I think it was last year
fired 500 people. Everyone is aware of that. My goodness,
to find out now that they are fire selling their ad space.
SHUSTER:
Congressman, let‘s talk about the public trust. You represent, of
course, a district in western Tennessee. What was the name of the
last soldier from your district who was killed in Iraq?
BLACKBURN: The name of the last soldier killed in Iraq, from my district, I do not know.
SHUSTER: His name was Jeremy Bohannan (ph). He was killed August 9, 2007. How come you did not know that the name?
BLACKBURN: I do not
know why I did not know the name. We made contact with the families in
our district. When you have a major military post, you are very
sensitive to this and sensitive to working with those families, and
that is something that my staff and I do daily. Our district director
is a gentleman who has served in the U.S. Army and currently serves in
the National Guard. And we do everything that we possibly can do to
assist those families. We are very appreciative of the sacrifice.
SHUSTER: But you
were not appreciative enough to know the name of this young man.
He was 18 years old and killed. Yet you can say chapter and verse
about what‘s going on with the “New York Times” and MoveOn.org.
Go here for the remainder, scroll down towards the bottom of the transcript.
and.
The spirit, no let's call it what it is, the stench of Karl Rove lives
on in the White House and the environs. From Monday's "Countdown" show
on MSNBC comes a further charge that the Bush-sters will lie about
anything: Try to find another national media outlet that covered this
charge by Harman -- we dare you. Make sure you have lots and lots of
time.
OLBERMANN: The
Bush administration knowingly used, quote, bogus intelligence, unquote,
to make lawmakers believe there was a chance of an imminent attack on
the U.S. Capitol and thus frighten them into passing a temporary
expansion of its powers to spy on Americans under the FISA Act.
That is the charge of the chairwoman of the House Homeland Security
Subcommittee on terrorism risk assessment.
Our third story on the
COUNTDOWN, for two years this newscast has recorded the
administration‘s willingness to try to terrify the public into voting
Republican. It has chronicled the fears of the politicization of
terror, fears originating even from the first Homeland Secretary Tom
Ridge. But these charges from California Democrat Jane Harmon are
the most overt accusations yet of a government gone so wrong that it is
using the terrorists‘ weapon of fear against its own people and against
other legislators who will not go along with the program.
Congresswoman Harmon made her
charge at a forum on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, FISA,
conducted in Washington by the Center For American Progress. She
says that on August 2nd, hours before lawmakers were to leave for a
month long recess, word of specific intelligence led to increased
security around the Capitol. Republican Congressman Zach Wamp of
Tennessee said at the time, quote, the leaders of the committees of
jurisdiction have been briefed on threats to the Capitol.”
And in urging Congress to give
Mr. Bush the extra spying powers he wanted, Senator Trent Lott said on
that date that, quote, “the disaster could be on our doorstep.”
Congresswoman Harmon said the unreliability of the so-called
intelligence about the attack on the Capitol before the 9/11
anniversary was only made clear the very day lawmakers approved the
temporary expansion of Bush‘s spy powers. “That specific
intelligence claim, it turned out, was bogus,” said Representative
Harmon. “The intelligence agencies knew that.”
She added that the
administration was guilty of a “Rovian strategy of using terrorism as a
wedge political issue.” Talk about the nexus of politics and
terror. At the same forum with Congresswoman Harmon was Bruce
Fein, former associate deputy attorney general under Ronald Reagan, now
chairman of the American Freedom Agenda. Thank you for your time
again tonight, sir.
Go here for the remainder, the story begins about halfway down the transcript.
Here's a similar link, with video of Olbermann and Fein.
Here's a link to a similar article.
top
RSS feed
|