May 17, 2005
Can Rove and Bush Go Any Lower?
If individuals are willing to play politics with the safety and national psyche of the nation they represent, what's left?
Hmmm...maybe a voting day plan to disable
the wheelchairs and steal the walking canes of the handicapped and
infirm who lean Democratic? How about kidnapping the seeing eye dogs of
those disposed to vote for Democrats? But surely secretly supporting
abortions for women registered as Democrats is a non-starter?
This latest indiscretion seems reaching
beyond the bottom of the barrel. But that's Karl Rove's specialty and
he calls the election tunes that George Bush ever so eagerly dances.
Here are some excerpts from the article on this subject.
5/10/2005
Ridge reveals clashes on alerts
By Mimi Hall, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON The Bush administration periodically put the USA on
high alert for terrorist attacks even though then-Homeland Security
chief Tom Ridge argued there was only flimsy evidence to justify
raising the threat level, Ridge now says.
Ridge, who resigned Feb. 1, said Tuesday that he often disagreed with
administration officials who wanted to elevate the threat level to
orange, or "high" risk of terrorist attack, but was overruled.
His comments at a Washington forum describe spirited debates over
terrorist intelligence and provide rare insight into the inner workings
of the nation's homeland security apparatus.
Ridge said he wanted to "debunk the myth" that his agency was
responsible for repeatedly raising the alert under a color-coded system
he unveiled in 2002.
"More often than not we were the least inclined to raise it," Ridge
told reporters. "Sometimes we disagreed with the intelligence
assessment. Sometimes we thought even if the intelligence was good, you
don't necessarily put the country on (alert). ... There were times when
some people were really aggressive about raising it, and we said, 'For
that?'..."
"...You have to use that tool of communication very sparingly," Ridge
said at the forum, which was attended by seven other former department
leaders.
The level is raised if a majority on the President's Homeland Security
Advisory Council favors it and President Bush concurs. Among those on
the council with Ridge were Attorney General John Ashcroft, FBI chief
Robert Mueller, CIA director George Tenet, Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Colin Powell.
Ridge and Ashcroft publicly clashed over how to communicate threat
information to the public. But Ridge has never before discussed
internal dissention over the threat level...
Contributing: Associated Press
Well, the mainstream media certainly didn't seem that all perturbed by this disclosure. How much play did this get?
Shouldn't the recommendation of the Homeland Security (note the
previous two words) director carry greater weight than any other member
of the council? Especially George (Slam Dunk) Tenet and John (Jesus'
Crucifixion Doesn't Qualify As Torture) Ashcroft?
No, it apparently was much more critical and important (not for
national alertness but for George Bush's re-election) that the American
populace be scared.
President Bush would assuredly and adamantly deny there was any
subterfuge going on with terror alerts. Heck, even if you could cajole
him into admitting it, he would dismiss such acts as "just politics"
like he did when confronted with accusations of vilely smearing John
McCain's wife and daughter during the South Carolina presidential
primary in 2000.
A question: would President Bush gloss over Jesus' death as "just politics"?
Just asking.
top
RSS feed
|