I Cogitate

Recent Posts My Best Blogs Archives Favorite Quotes Links Contact
May 17, 2005

Can Rove and Bush Go Any Lower?

If individuals are willing to play politics with the safety and national psyche of the nation they represent, what's left?

Hmmm...maybe a voting day plan to disable the wheelchairs and steal the walking canes of the handicapped and infirm who lean Democratic? How about kidnapping the seeing eye dogs of those disposed to vote for Democrats? But surely secretly supporting abortions for women registered as Democrats is a non-starter?

This latest indiscretion seems reaching beyond the bottom of the barrel. But that's Karl Rove's specialty and he calls the election tunes that George Bush ever so eagerly dances. Here are some excerpts from the article on this subject.

5/10/2005
Ridge reveals clashes on alerts
By Mimi Hall, USA TODAY


WASHINGTON ­ The Bush administration periodically put the USA on high alert for terrorist attacks even though then-Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge argued there was only flimsy evidence to justify raising the threat level, Ridge now says.

Ridge, who resigned Feb. 1, said Tuesday that he often disagreed with administration officials who wanted to elevate the threat level to orange, or "high" risk of terrorist attack, but was overruled.

His comments at a Washington forum describe spirited debates over terrorist intelligence and provide rare insight into the inner workings of the nation's homeland security apparatus.

Ridge said he wanted to "debunk the myth" that his agency was responsible for repeatedly raising the alert under a color-coded system he unveiled in 2002.

"More often than not we were the least inclined to raise it," Ridge told reporters. "Sometimes we disagreed with the intelligence assessment. Sometimes we thought even if the intelligence was good, you don't necessarily put the country on (alert). ... There were times when some people were really aggressive about raising it, and we said, 'For that?'..."

"...You have to use that tool of communication very sparingly," Ridge said at the forum, which was attended by seven other former department leaders.

The level is raised if a majority on the President's Homeland Security Advisory Council favors it and President Bush concurs. Among those on the council with Ridge were Attorney General John Ashcroft, FBI chief Robert Mueller, CIA director George Tenet, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Colin Powell.

Ridge and Ashcroft publicly clashed over how to communicate threat information to the public. But Ridge has never before discussed internal dissention over the threat level...

Contributing: Associated Press

Well, the mainstream media certainly didn't seem that all perturbed by this disclosure. How much play did this get?

Shouldn't the recommendation of the Homeland Security (note the previous two words) director carry greater weight than any other member of the council? Especially George (Slam Dunk) Tenet and John (Jesus' Crucifixion Doesn't Qualify As Torture) Ashcroft?

No, it apparently was much more critical and important (not for national alertness but for George Bush's re-election) that the American populace be scared.

President Bush would assuredly and adamantly deny there was any subterfuge going on with terror alerts. Heck, even if you could cajole him into admitting it, he would dismiss such acts as "just politics" like he did when confronted with accusations of vilely smearing John McCain's wife and daughter during the South Carolina presidential primary in 2000.

A question: would President Bush gloss over Jesus' death as "just politics"?

Just asking.

top

RSS feed link RSS feed

Recent Posts My Best Blogs Archives Favorite Quotes Links Contact