May 2, 2006
Vanity Fair does Patrick Fitzgerald
The January 2006 issue of Vanity Fair has a David Margolick-written
lengthy look at Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald. The more I read
it, the more I liked Fitzgerald and his values and actions.
And that isn't solely because he refuses to be intimidated by the 'vanity fair' of the Bush Administration.
Patrick Fitzgerald will not be sucked into the Bush/Rove/Cheney vortex
and could care less what Bob (Savin' My Ass) Woodward, Victoria (damn,
where's my White House talking points memo) Toensing and Judith (I know
Ahmed Chalabi and Patrick Fitzgerald can't hold a candle to his
truthiness) Miller have to say about him.
Before getting to the article, enjoy a few quotes from Patrick
Fitzgerald himself, made during the press conference announcing Lewis
Libby's indictment:
"When citizens testify before grand juries they are required to tell
the truth. Without the truth, our criminal justice system cannot serve
our nation or its citizens. The requirement to tell the truth applies
equally to all citizens, including persons who hold high positions in
government...
...When I was in New York working as a prosecutor, we brought those
cases because we realized that the truth is the engine of our judicial
system. And if you compromise the truth, the whole process is lost...
...Any notion that anyone might have that there's a different standard
for a high official, that this is somehow singling out obstruction of
justice and perjury, is upside down.
...If these facts are true, if we were to walk away from this and not
charge obstruction of justice and perjury, we might as well just hand
in our jobs. Because our jobs, the criminal justice system, is to make
sure people tell us the truth. And when it's a high-level official and
a very sensitive investigation, it is a very, very serious matter that
no one should take lightly.
...You need to know at the time that he (Libby) transmitted the
information, he appreciated that it was classified information, that he
knew it or acted, in certain statutes, with recklessness. And that is
sort of what gets back to my point. In trying to figure that out, you
need to know what the truth is. So our allegation is in trying to drill
down and find out exactly what we got here, if we received false
information, that process is frustrated. But at the end of the day, I
think I want to say one more thing, which is: When you do a criminal
case, if you find a violation, it doesn't really, in the end, matter
what statute you use if you vindicate the interest."
*** Whatever the outcome of the Libby case and if there are any others, you
simply can't roll or smear Patrick Fitzgerald--much as the Bushies and
their syncophants have tried.
Mr. Fitz Goes to Washington
By DAVID MARGOLICK
Vanity Fair
February 2006
U.S. Attorney Patrick
Fitzgerald is a crime-busting phenomenon, the scourge of al-Qaeda
terrorists, corrupt Chicago political machines, former media tycoon
Conrad Black, and—as special prosecutor in the Valerie Plame
investigation—the West Wing. Meet Karl Rove's worst nightmare
For months he was the
specter haunting Washington, rarely seen and even more rarely heard,
incessantly discussed, psychoanalyzed, anticipated, criticized—and
feared. Who, everyone wondered, was this guy Patrick Fitzgerald, and
exactly what was he up to? What was taking him so long? Why was he
seemingly letting columnist Robert Novak, the source of all the
trouble, off the hook? And where would it all end, especially after he
threw New York Times reporter Judith Miller in the clink for refusing
to answer his questions? Critics labeled him a First Amendment scourge
and compared him to Inspector Javert, the monomaniacal policeman in Les
Misérables, a man without humanity or perspective. A "runaway
Chicago prosecutor," columnist William Safire called him. A
"junkyard-dog prosecutor," seconded The Washington Post's Bob Woodward.
Fitzgerald's treatment of Miller, CNN anchor Lou Dobbs charged, was "an
onerous, disgusting abuse of government power."
Then, on October 28,
everything magically flipped when Pat Fitzgerald took his place on the
television screen. The president of the United States was in one corner
and the vice president in another, but they were each on mute; it was
Fitzgerald—the 45-year-old son of an Irish-immigrant doorman, the man
who'd questioned all of the president's men and the reporters to whom
they liked to leak—that people really wanted to hear.
Officially, Fitzgerald's
mission that day was to announce that a federal grand jury had charged
Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby,
with five counts of perjury, obstruction of justice, and lying to the
F.B.I. But his agenda was actually more ambitious. He would explain why
his investigation, designed to determine who had leaked the name of
C.I.A. agent Valerie Plame to the press, had netted only someone who'd
allegedly lied about it afterward, and why that mattered, and what
accounted for the ferocity with which he'd handled it. He would lay out
the legal issues involved. And mostly, after nearly two years of taking
hits silently, he would finally introduce himself to America.
The face he showed that
day looked a bit banged up, as if he'd just come out of a rugby game,
though in fact it reflected only sleeplessness. There was a kind of
wide-eyed, youthful sweetness to it. One easily understood why, when
Fitzgerald and Andrew McCarthy, a fellow Irish-American, had prosecuted
Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman in a Manhattan terror bombing and
assassination conspiracy a decade ago, defense lawyers petitioned for a
recess on Ash Wednesday: the blackened foreheads of the prosecutors
would only accentuate their maddening altar-boy images. (The judge,
incidentally, granted the request.)
All three networks
pre-empted their regular programming for the announcement of the
grand-jury indictment of Libby except, oddly enough, in Fitzgerald's
current home base of Chicago, where he was bumped by the White Sox
victory parade. But it didn't matter; there, at least, they already
knew him. He started nervously, blurting out his words in shaky,
sometimes garbled phrases. One could detect the shyness his friends
routinely describe. Staring ahead blankly, speaking mechanically, he
laid out his case against Libby as if reading it off a teleprompter. In
fact, although he'd written something down beforehand, what he said was
entirely extemporaneous; while the rest of Fitzgerald was still
unwinding, his remarkable mind was already up to speed. The angst and
awkwardness vanished once he took questions, and that made sense; he
had always been better, more himself, in rebuttals than in opening
statements. When he had to think on the fly, he could be sincere, joke
or provoke, become Everyman. "We all have our shticks: his is the
up-from-the-gutter Irish kid from a poor family," says a lawyer in the
Plame case. "It's essentially authentic. But it's also served him well."
Again and again, reporters
pressed Fitzgerald for specifics, not just about Libby but also about
Dick Cheney (who had discussed Plame with his chief of staff before the
leak), White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove (who had discussed
Plame with at least two reporters), and Novak (who had outed Plame in
his syndicated column, then, presumably, told Fitzgerald). They got
only crumbs, but Fitzgerald doled them out entertainingly and
ingratiatingly, appearing more forthcoming than he really was. Some
non-answers came with humor, some with baseball metaphors or
colloquialisms. There was none of the usual lawyerly stiffness and
aloofness, nor was there elegance or eloquence. Fitzgerald was modest,
self-deprecating, nimble, patient, accessible, even-tempered,
reassuring, likable, real. And the press quickly turned. Charles
Laughton as Inspector Javert suddenly morphed into Jimmy Stewart as Mr.
Smith and Kevin Costner as Eliot Ness.
To read the rest, go here.
top
RSS feed
|