May 26, 2005
Victor Davis Hanson - Do Your Homework!
In
the Op-Ed section of today's San Jose Mercury News, Victor Davis Hanson
regurgitates the fruitloop canard of liberal media bias.
Here is his column:
May. 26, 2005
San Jose Mercury News
The left can quit whining about bias when they stop infusing news with it
By Victor Davis Hanson
The recent Dan Rather and Newsweek controversies
hardly seem connected. But on closer examination, both incidents
symbolize what has gone wrong with traditional news organizations.
The old assumption was that opinion media -- such
as the National Review, the Nation and the New Republic -- offer a
slant on current events, but that major news outlets, outside of their
designated opinion sections, do not.
It's easy to see why people no longer feel they can
rely on a CBS News or a Newsweek for information without bias. At CBS,
Dan Rather persistently wished us to believe that a clearly forged memo
was authentic. Michael Isikoff's reliance on a single anonymous and
unreliable source about supposed desecration of the Koran made an
already jaded public believe that Newsweek was too eager to deliver a
one-sided story.
Three now-common themes appeared in each controversy:
First, the misinformation erred predictably against
the current American government. In CBS's case, anchorman Rather
impugned the president's past military service. The Newsweek article
questioned the ethics and sense of the American military.
Second, these were not minor slips. The counterfeit
documents that Rather circulated undercut a sitting commander-in-chief
in the midst of a national election. The fraud had the potential to
alter the very governance of the United States. Newsweek's wrong
information incited the lunatic elements of the Middle East. Rioting
and death followed, complicating the American military effort.
Third, neither organization was markedly contrite
when exposed. The culpable Rather refashioned himself as the maligned
target of the blogosphere. Newsweek spokesmen whined that a vindictive
administration was hounding the management of their organization.
In response, the public assumed haughty news
organizations were caught exhibiting the usual partiality -- and then
on spec retreated to victim status when challenged.
These recent controversies about our flagship news
agencies were old news to the public. The New York Times still has not
recovered from the Jayson Blair scandal, in which a young reporter
wrote fictitious stories. Blair's compliant editors worried more about
political correctness than the qualifications and experience of their
own reporters.
The same syndrome was true earlier at the
Washington Post and the Boston Globe, which were red-faced over the
fabrications of reporter Janet Cooke and columnist Patricia Smith,
respectively.
With each exposé, the harm has become cumulative -- driving the public away from a now-stained mainstream media.
News purists mock the yelling of conservative talk
radio, hypersensitive renegade bloggers on the Internet and the sharp
elbows of cable news. They shouldn't. All serve the public as an
antidote to the ``disinterested'' High News that it no longer entirely
believes.
Bigheaded lectures for the umpteenth time about the
``century-old standards'' at the New York Times, the ``legacy'' of
Edward R. Murrow or the ``prestige'' of the Columbia University
Graduate School of Journalism do not cut it anymore in a world of
Jayson Blair, Eason Jordan and Dan Rather.
Liberal copycats of talk radio fail, not because
they are always boring but because there is little market or even need
for such a counter-establishment media.
A fire-breathing Rush Limbaugh or snapping Bill
O'Reilly might not receive many honorary doctorates, speak at Ivy
League commencements or carry off the Peabody Award. Yet they come off
as no more opinionated than an anointed Peter Jennings or insider Bill
Moyers -- and a lot more honest about their own politics and the medium
in which they work.
If the left wishes to curb the influence of the new
prairie-fire media, the answer is not to subsidize an Air America, the
failing liberal talk-radio network. There is no need to lure Al Gore
back into the picture, or to pour more of George Soros' money into
another MoveOn.org-like Web site.
Instead, liberals themselves must begin balking at
the infusion of their political views in the mainstream media. Once the
public again trusts major news outlets to be objective, media bias will
no longer be news.
VICTOR DAVIS HANSON is a classicist and historian at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.
Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian? What happened to
standards? Or is he slumming and just churning out gibberish to fulfill
his agreement with the San Jose Mercury News? Could it be there something in the water up at Stanford causing this?
Let's hope his pontifications on left wing media bias in Thursday's
Op-Ed section is but an aberration and not indicative of his other work.
He states that Air America is failing but lists no factual support for
his claim. A quick check on Google indicates that startup Air America
is doing just fine, especially in metropolitan areas where it should.
He states Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly are "no more opinionated than
an annointed Peter Jennings or insider and Bill Moyers--and a lot more
honest about their own politics..."
Huh?
Mr. Hanson, please give me an example (dates and times) of Peter Jennings offering opinions on his network news show?
I'm waiting.
Bill Moyers IS upfront about his political views and when he hosted the
PBS show NOW, such rightwingers as Grover Norquist, Paul Weyrich.
Richard Viguerie, Stephen Moore and others appeared as guests.
Just how many times have Limbaugh and O'Reilly allowed air time for
left wingers? Especially so without badgering or insulting them?
How many times have these two been caught in factual errors? Check the web site Media Matters
(yes, a leftwing site) for details of factual errors spouted by
O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and others, with no subsequent
acknowledgement of such.
Comparing Peter Jennings and Bill Moyers to the likes of Limbaugh and
O'Reilly is like conjoining Enrico Caruso with Josh Groban.
Mr. Hanson: please refute this from conservative stalwart William
Kristol: "I admit it--the liberal media were never that powerful, and
the whole thing was often used as an excuse by conservatives for
conservative failures." The New Yorker, 5/22/95
Mr. Hanson: please read Eric Alterman's book "What Liberal Media?" Please factually refute the case he lays out.
Mr. Hanson: please research your material before you use it in your columns. That should be a given.
top
RSS feed
|