September 19, 2005
William Rehnquist -- do not let him go gentle into that good night
Why
is it that the newly dead get a free pass? That all blemishes of the
recently passed get shellacked by a shiny coat of stain-free varnish.
Aren't you just waiting for the obituary that reads in part: "in
reality, he was such an ornery son-of-a-bitch who used to kick puppies,
scare babies and beat his wife half to death when he got drunk..." No,
we get 'devoted' this and 'cherished' that and loving gets mentioned at
least 10 times.
Well, Alan Dershowitz breaks the mold with this Huffington Post
opinion piece on the late Chief Justice of the Supreme Court William
Rehnquist, whose public fawning over his death just came to a close.
Some people are great, some become great, some people remain hacks despite the most furious application of smoke and mirrors.
To the best of my knowledge, Rehnquist was not a puppy kicker, baby scarer or wife beater for you literalists but...
09.04.2005
Telling the Truth About Chief Justice Rehnquist
Alan Dershowitz
My mother always told me that when a person
dies, one should not say anything bad about him. My mother was wrong.
History requires truth, not puffery or silence, especially about
powerful governmental figures. And obituaries are a first draft of
history.
So here’s the truth about Chief Justice
Rehnquist you won’t hear on Fox News or from politicians. Chief Justice
William Rehnquist set back liberty, equality, and human rights perhaps
more than any American judge of this generation. His rise to power
speaks volumes about the current state of American values.
Let’s begin at the beginning. Rehnquist
bragged about being first in his class at Stanford Law School. Today
Stanford is a great law school with a diverse student body, but in the
late 1940s and early 1950s, it discriminated against Jews and other
minorities, both in the admission of students and in the selection of
faculty. Justice Stephen Breyer recalled an earlier period of
Stanford’s history: “When my father was at Stanford, he could not join
any of the social organizations because he was Jewish, and those
organizations, at that time, did not accept Jews.” Rehnquist not only
benefited in his class ranking from this discrimination; he was also
part of that bigotry. When he was nominated to be an associate justice
in 1971, I learned from several sources who had known him as a student
that he had outraged Jewish classmates by goose-stepping and
heil-Hitlering with brown-shirted friends in front of a dormitory that
housed the school’s few Jewish students. He also was infamous for
telling racist and anti-Semitic jokes.
As a law clerk, Rehnquist wrote a memorandum
for Justice Jackson while the court was considering several school
desegregation cases, including Brown v. Board of Education. Rehnquist’s
memo, entitled “A Random Thought on the Segregation Cases,” defended
the separate-but-equal doctrine embodied in the 1896 Supreme Court case
of Plessy v. Ferguson. Rehnquist concluded the Plessy “was right and
should be reaffirmed.” When questioned about the memos by the Senate
Judiciary Committee in both 1971 and 1986, Rehnquist blamed his defense
of segregation on the dead Justice, stating – under oath – that his
memo was meant to reflect the views of Justice Jackson. But Justice
Jackson voted in Brown, along with a unanimous Court, to strike down
school segregation. According to historian Mark Tushnet, Justice
Jackson’s longtime legal secretary called Rehnquist’s Senate testimony
an attempt to “smear the reputation of a great justice.” Rehnquist
later admitted to defending Plessy in arguments with fellow law clerks.
He did not acknowledge that he committed perjury in front of the
Judiciary Committee to get his job.
The young Rehnquist began his legal career
as a Republican functionary by obstructing African-American and
Hispanic voting at Phoenix polling locations (“Operation Eagle Eye”).
As Richard Cohen of The Washington Post wrote, “[H]e helped challenge
the voting qualifications of Arizona blacks and Hispanics. He was
entitled to do so. But even if he did not personally harass potential
voters, as witnesses allege, he clearly was a brass-knuckle partisan,
someone who would deny the ballot to fellow citizens for trivial
political reasons -- and who made his selection on the basis of race or
ethnicity.” In a word, he started out his political career as a
Republican thug.
...Rehnquist served on the Supreme Court for
thirty-three years and as chief justice for nineteen. Yet no opinion
comes to mind which will be remembered as brilliant, innovative, or
memorable. He will be remembered not for the quality of his opinions
but rather for the outcomes decided by his votes, especially Bush v.
Gore, in which he accepted an Equal Protection claim that was totally
inconsistent with his prior views on that clause. He will also be
remembered as a Chief Justice who fought for the independence and
authority of the judiciary. This is his only positive contribution to
an otherwise regressive career....
To read the entire article, go here.
top
RSS feed
|