May 11, 2005
Yalta Schmalta
Like me, do you keep waiting for President Bush's pants to combust when he opens his mouth?
It's like he is incapable of either telling the truth or of
understanding the 'big picture' enough to accurately present it. Or
could it be that reality, as it does so often, is just too messy, facts
get in the way and are, well, biased.
Here is an are excerpt from a Jacob Heilbruun commentary in today's Los Angeles Times on President Bush's recent comments on World War II and Eastern Europe:
May 10, 2005
COMMENTARY
Once Again, the Big Yalta Lie
By Jacob Heilbrunn, Jacob Heilbrunn is a Times editorial writer.
During his visit to the Baltics
over the weekend, President Bush infuriated Russian leader Vladimir V.
Putin by declaring the obvious: that the Soviet domination of Eastern
Europe was "one of the greatest wrongs of history." But it was what he
said next comparing the Yalta accord among Franklin D. Roosevelt,
Winston Churchill and Josef Stalin in 1945 to the Hitler-Stalin pact
that should cause outrage here at home.
The claim that Roosevelt betrayed
Eastern Europe at Yalta, and that he set the stage for 40 years of
Soviet domination, is an old right-wing canard. By repeating it, and by
publicly charging that the Yalta agreement was in the "unjust
tradition" of Hitler's deal with Stalin, Bush was simply engaging in
cheap historical revisionism. His glib comments belong to the Ann
Coulter school of history.
The slander against Roosevelt that
Bush has taken up dates back to the early 1950s, after Harry Truman and
Dean Acheson had supposedly "lost" China to communism. That's when the
American right first decried what it viewed as a consistent pattern of
"appeasement" in the Democratic Party. The right contended that
Roosevelt "sold out" Eastern Europe at the Yalta conference by
promising the Soviets an unchallenged sphere of influence in the
region...
...The truth is that Yalta did not
hand Eastern Europe to the Soviets. That territory was already in their
possession. Stalin had made clear his plan to take over as much
territory as possible back in the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact of 1939,
which carved Poland in half and gave the Soviets the Baltic states. The
discovery in 1943 of the massacre of Polish officers by the Soviet army
in the Katyn forest was further evidence of Stalin's malign intention
to exterminate the leadership of Poland. Then, in 1944, during the
Warsaw uprising by the Polish Home Army, Stalin halted the advance of
his army on the banks of the Vistula River and allowed Nazi SS units to
return to slaughter the Poles. By the time of Yalta, the Red Army
occupied all of Poland and much of Eastern Europe.
Theoretically, Churchill and
Roosevelt could have refused to cut any deal with Stalin at Yalta. But
that could have started the Cold War on the spot. It would have
seriously jeopardized the common battle against Germany (at a moment
when Roosevelt was concerned with winning Soviet assent to help fight
the Japanese, which he received).
Supreme Allied Commander Dwight
Eisenhower was happy to let the Soviets bear the brunt of the fighting
as they marched toward Berlin, and he was unwilling to expend American
troops on storming the German capital. The only one who was eager to do
that was Gen. George Patton, who hoped to take on the Russians as well.
Given the domestic pressure to "bring the boys back home," Roosevelt
would have been taking a politically suicidal course had he broken with
our allies, the Soviets.
Roosevelt was hardly perfect at
Yalta. He was naive about Stalin's intentions and believed he could
cajole the dictator into following more moderate policies. But FDR's
approach was not particularly different from that of Churchill (who had
declared that he would "sup with the devil" to win the war, which is
what he and Roosevelt, in effect, did).
Okay, President Bush. Let's order China out of
Tibet this very moment. Put a vise-grip on Hu Jintao and squeeze until
that Commie pleads for mercy. What's that? Yep, revoke the most-favored
nation trade status for those Reds. You mean to tell me you haven't
done that already? And tell 'em hands off of Taiwan. If they squawk,
put the fear of God in them with the threat that you'll hunt them down
'til rounded up dead or alive.
Then let's go after Pervez Musharraf's
military dictatorship in Pakistan. We certainly can't prop up such an
non-democratic dictator because, you know, beacon of liberty, God's
freedom, and all that stuff you've been promoting lately. Especially
after his top scientist, A Q Khan sold nuclear secrets to other bad
guys that threaten us. Certainly nothing could possibly deter you from
bringing this iron fister to justice, right? A guy who is protecting
someone more dangerous than Osama? Nab his outlaw buddy while you're at
it--go for the twofer.
Now, Uzbekistan (what is it with these -stan countries?) has got to
change. This guy, president-for-life Islam Karimov, seems to prefer his
subjects boiled medium well in water. Well, George, you
had him over for a meet-and-greet at the White House in 2002. Did you
read him the riot act? He's still putting his 'favorites' on the
barbie. I know, I know, that air base he lets us maintain there sure
might be helpful but just what is your strategery Bushman?
Now this one should be a piece of cake. Good ol' Crown Prince Abdullah
of Saudi Arabia. Yes Mr. Wahhabism himself. When do we start bombing?
The invasion commences when? Well, just what is going on? I saw
you holding hands with one of his ambassadors at the ranch in Crawford
the other day. I fully expected you to whip him into a full nelson
until he begged for mercy. Instead you two were talking about flowers
like some girlymen. I'm flummoxed. 15 of Abdullah's countrymen were in
that bunch that destroyed the Twin Towers and killed 3,000 people in
New York and you're rubbing palms with one of his flunkies?
What's that? All I'm hearing is sputtering ifs, ands and buts. That
doesn't sound like you President Bush. Strong, steadfast, no nuance or
shades of gray in your beliefs or actions, as far from being a moral
relativist as imaginable, is what we're told you are.
Tell us again.
top
RSS feed
|