-->
To reach

"Decriminalize head injury."

Either scroll down or click HERE

Page 4 (of 4)
Acronym definitions
  • PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
  • TBI --- Traumatic Brain Injury.
  • ADA -- Americans with Disabilities Act.

  • DSS ---- Disabled Student Services at UC Santa Cruz. I was their client starting Fall 1984 to Spring 1990.
  • DSPandS - Disabled Students Program and Services at Cabrillo College. I was their client starting Fall 1991 to Spring 2007.
  • DRC --- Disabled Resource Center at UC Santa Cruz. I was their client starting Fall 2007 to Spring 2008.



  • DSS was renamed DRC after my sham graduation from UC Santa Cruz in 1989. Their website says in the 1990's, but no more accurate information is available. I found the exact same facade of service under a new name. Changing the name had affected the hostility I found with DSS. It was more apparent with DRC.
  • DSPandS was renamed Accessibility Support Center (ASC) when I checked in November 2014. Is this the same facade of service under a new name?
My Mom when she was four, her
mother and, in the background,
her maternal; aunts and uncles.

I am a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) survivor with a degree in Biochemistry, I earned after my accident. The experts kept telling me, healing from my
TBI was no longer possible. Happily, I ignored them (their dire/sadistic attempts to make me feel hopeless) and listened to other head injury survivors.
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy did allow me recovery from my TBI 31 years after the climbing accident my family and friends thought had killed me,

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) - Recovery for Head Injury (TBI) Survivors.
The equation used
as an example.
25 years after my accident.
No HBOT sessions.
15 minutes using a pencil.
Lots of erasing.
31 years after my accident
and 60 HBOT sessions.
About one minute using a pen.
No erasing.

Right shoe
Severe dragging damage

Before HBOT.


Right shoe
Little dragging damage

After three HBOT sessions.

My right shoe (in the left picture) illustrates the damage to my right shoe caused by my foot dragging on the ground. I was tired of exercising and having it not respond. I had no expectations of it ever changing.
I have been using the shoe (in the right picture) for three months. Damage from dragging on the ground is no longer an expensive and unpleasant reality. No more cheap, uncomfortable and poorly made shoes!
In 1983, a 165 foot rock climbing fall left me in coma for six weeks, with a broken back, a TBI and other serious injuries. 31 years after my accident I had finally given up on exercising to improve my physical condition. The right side of my body didn't respond to motor input anymore. Exercise made me tired, but had no effect on my right side - it was really discouraging. Then in August 2014 I heard about HBOT on Brain Injury Radio. Intrigued, I contacted Bay Area Hyperbarics though I had no expectations of ever having a functioning right side of my body again.
I was (and am) utterly astounded by this completely unexpected positive increase in my physical well being.

After 60 HBOT sessions:
  • I am using my diaphragm to form words again. The volume and depth of my voice is increasing. It is becoming easier for me to make myself heard in noisy locations. My normal speaking voice is returning after being gone for 31 years.
  • After session 3, I realized my right foot was not longer dragging on the ground. It was ruining my shoes and

    The picture above is a link to Bay Area Hyperbarics,
    in the southern San Francisco Bay Area.
    did not respond to exercise, I did not know what else I could do.
  • I was so used to chewing with the left side of my mouth, that I was unaware I was doing that. After 31 years I chew with both sides of my mouth again.
  • I can stand with weight on my right leg again. It would not support me before HBOT and I fell a few times a year for 31 years.
  • After 31 years I have stopped favoring my right leg. My weight is equally spread between my feet once more.
  • After 31 years I no longer lean to the right.
  • After 31 years fine motor control is returning to the right side of my body.
  • I can shave faster with less pressure.
  • Before session 16 I was able to stand free without having to constantly brace myself.
  • After 31 years I can read print with both eyes open again.
  • After 31 years I can hand write letters again.
  • I can pet my cat with my right hand now, without her trying to bite me.
  • After 31 years I can eat using my right hand again.
  • For the first time ever I can write my own mathematical equations (calculus) and have the time to error check them for Algebraic mistakes.
  • I can tutor mathematics, chemistry and physics because now I have the ability to show in writing what I am talking about. Before Hyperbarics I was physically unable to do that.

TBI survivors need to know that they have an alternative to being alone, feeling depressed and miserable about themselves.
I will always be grateful to Bay Area Hyperbarics for helping me mitigate the more serious effects of my TBI.
Page 4 (of 4)
Click here for a brief
summary of this website
May 29, 2015
Scroll down to
TBI page navigation
or click HERE.

Remember to scroll
up to return here.

Decriminalize head injury.
  • Support TBI survivors in higher education.
  • Toughen and Enforce The ADA.
  • Make feedback mandatory.
  • Make staff accountable for their actions.

Wireless Technology (WiFi) has serious concerns which
are being deliberately withheld from the consumer.
Ex: Lack of Media coverage of brain cancer causes.

Independent scientists are in rare agreement on
this issue. Read what they are saying about
wireless communications by clicking Here.

Scientific studies and opinions concerning
wireless communications (54), click Links

Better late then never.
31 years after my accident I found
completely unexpected recovery.
Click on HYPERBARICS
to see my amazing experience.

DSS, DSPandS, DRC and other acronyms used are defined HERE

Remember to scroll
down to return here.

Wireless links 1 - 27
Wireless links 28 - 54
Page 4 section 1
Page 4 section 2
“Plausible Deniability”
    In the case that illegal or otherwise disreputable and unpopular activities become public, high-ranking (school) officials may deny any awareness of such act in order to insulate themselves and shift blame on the agents who carried out the acts, confident that their doubters will be unable to prove otherwise. The lack of evidence to the contrary ostensibly makes the denial plausible, that is, credible. The term typically implies forethought, such as intentionally setting up the conditions to plausibly avoid responsibility for one's (future) actions or knowledge. In some organizations, legal doctrines such as command responsibility exist to hold major parties responsible for the actions of subordinates involved in heinous acts and nullify any legal protection that their denial of involvement would carry.

What is the true cost of
WiFi on Higher Education?
All wireless technology should carry
A Warning Label
That warns about the suspected hazards
of wireless technology (microwave radiation).
-->
Wireless technology
  • We need to slowdown on the extensive implementation of “wireless technology” and first establish guidelines for its safe use.
  • Why isn't the media doing their job and warning us (the consumers) about the hazards of wireless technology?
  • We need guidelines for the safe use of this technology ased on scientific studies made by independent scientists - not industry shills.
  • How many studies are needed, before exposure to microwave radiation is linked to cancer and sterility?
A Biochemistry Graduate, who read and analyzed more then 35 Chemistry research studies for his degree, thinks 54 links to studies and expert opinions, show a disturbing trend:

Router antenna
wrapped with
aluminum foil.
WiFi still active.

It appears that wireless technology (microwave radiation) scrambles the complex and intricate arrangement of our cellular DNA. This, highly ordered and structured, genetic material is critical for our proper development into human beings.

Who is experimenting on us and future generations by selling us "the convenience of wireless technology," without mentioning or cautioning about possible drawbacks to this technolgy? What independant scientific studies are they using before marketing this technology? For example:

  • Scientists have documented genetic damage from microwave radiation, yet we never hear of this.

The health of the consumer and the future of the human race are being disregarded, so someone can make $$$$.

Entire Router
covered with
aluminum foil.

Why aren'there warning labels on Wireless Technology?
How do we protect ourselves from microwave radiation?

100% of scholarly studies agree on the need for further study of wireless connections.
Here are two tables of links to the authors or signers of 54 Medical and
Scientific studies of Wireless Technology. Both are further down this page.
Click on Links 1 or Links 2 to go to either of those tables from here.

WiFi and its connection to my symptoms. They went away once I disabled my router.

  • I used the Internet through a WiFi connection (microwave radiation) from the fall of 2007 until July 11, 2014 when I disabled my router. There was no warning or caution about microwave
    WiFi in schools proven dangerous
    radiation. If there had been a warning label, I would have been much more cautious about using wireless technology. I unwittingly exposed myself to microwave radiation. I am unsure of the lasting damage, but I know there is some. I just don't know how much. People that do not have any experience with the biological effects of radiation are making decisions that poison us and our children with microwave radiation. These people are sacrificing our genetic heritage, DNA and its precise arrangement, for noteriety or money in their pocket (maybe both). Shame on our politicians for allowing them get away with what they are doing.

  • I am used to being able to think clearly and figure things out. Gradually I became less able to do that. I was becoming increasingly despondant most of the time, particularly when I was home. How much was due to the “Learned Helplessness” used on me by DSS, DSPandS and DRC will always be a mystery, but WiFi microwave radiation was a major contributer to my mental despair. I know that to be the case, because, since I disabled the router by wrapping it in foil (No WiFi) I am no longer being bombarded with microwave radiation. I can think clearly again. Figuring out problems has become exciting once more. I feel optimistic about the future - “Nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new ending.”

  • About a month ago I was coughing fairly regularly. I assumed it was due to my throat being irritated from practicing speaking. The head person at DSS had told me flat out there was nothing I could do to improve the quality of my voice and therefore, don't try. I bought into what she said because she was an expert and she would never mislead me. To make a long story short, she was lying (to hide her lack of knowledge?). I was practicing speaking text, but I had hit a plateau, my speaking ability was not improving.

    I realized that, for example, Mozart was not suddenly a piano virtuoso, he practiced playing the piano a lot. Why was I different? My voice (since my accident) has always bothered me. If I want to change it I can, but it will not be easy and I will have to practice a lot.

    I practice, practice and practice singing the lyrics from songs of The Moody Blues and
    Cell Phones and Brain Cancer - The Interphone Study
    The Beatles (I grew up with their music and know how the lyrics are supposed to sound. My vocal attempts are pathetic, but at least I'm trying). I practice singing the lyrics for at least an hour a day. Vocal stuff is very difficult for me and so it goes. I wish I had known to do this back when I had my accident. Instead I reinforced patterns of speaking badly for 30 years. Singing the lyrics to songs is breaking up old speech patterns. Reciting text was reinforcing the way I had been conditioned to speak (for 30 years).

    After my accident I had to learn to speak again, but I no place to practice and I was told my speaking efforts were pointless and a waste of time (DSS, DSPandS and DRC chose to ridicule me rather then rehabilitate me). DSS started the ridicule with their policy of “Learned Helplessness”, the ridicule that has been so destructive to my selfimage and the rest of my life. DSPandS and DRC chose to continue the “Learned Helplessness”, because they had not been trained to avoid it.

    I was told vocal change was impossible after the first year of my accident (mid July 1983), but I did not listen to the experts, I listened to myself and Brain Injury Radio instead. One of the hosts, LesPaul of the program, “Dream Catchers” (on Brain Injury Radio), was saying how he had got his speaking voice back after suffering a Brain Aneurysm by singing karaoke. I thought to give it a try and I am glad I did. 100% of people that know me have commented on my improved speaking ability, though it has been more then 31 years since my accident. I was told misleading information by the head of DSS 30 years ago. Maybe she did not know or maybe she was getting pleasure out of crushing my hopes of escaping from the box (mentally incompetant, vocally challanged, second class citizen, wasting her time, etc.) she
    BBC Panorama - WiFi - A Warning Signal 1
    was determined to cram me into - I don't know.

    Anyway, I thought my constant coughing was due to my throat being irritated from the dramatically increased air flow speaking entails. I was doing research into my symptoms and stumbled across the WiFi/microwave irradiation thing. Suddenly, all these seemingly, unrelated symptoms, started to make sense.

    Shocked, I tried wrapping the antenna of my router in foil (picture - Mostly WiFi), but that did not work, my laptop could still connect with the Internet. So I covered my entire router with foil to disable the WiFi (picture - No WiFi) - that worked. My laptop could no longer connect to the Internet. I turned off, "Airport mode," so it would not continue to bathe me with microwave radiation as it searched for a connection.

    The router was on the right side of my computer desk, at the same level as my sternum, pointing directly at my chest from three feet away. I put off seeing my doctor and disabled the WiFi aspect of my router. One is completely gone The other has shrunk to half the size they both were, before I disabled the WiFi portion of my router (12 days ago), so maybe it was not affected.

  • Microwave radiation is not ionizing radiation. It was not suspected of causing damage to the genetic material (DNA) of the cell. However there was a study by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) January 14, 2010 that associated WiFi (microwave radiation) exposure with a possible cancer risk. Click on NIH study to read the NIH report or on the Amercan Cancer Society's (ACS) call for more study of microwave radiation by clicking ACS call for more study.

  • Of course there are YouTube videos. Some are produced by charlatans with the aim of using your fears (which are valid) to rip you off. I have included five videos on WiFi use that I agree with and one on cell phone use. If you click on the YouTube icon at the bottom of any video, you can watch it on YouTube. Please feel free to distribute any and all links to these videos or to this page. The address is: http://members.cruzio.com/~awwalton/disability/part4.html#wifi. Thank you. We need to raise people's awareness of the dangers of wireless technology before it is too late.

  • One claim I have yet to see demonstrated see is how this newly discovered material will protect you from radiation by some magical property. All you have do (after paying some incredibly low price) is wear a medallion around your neck. Imagine a sunblock that was claimed to work by wearing it around your neck. Would you believe that possible? Why didn't Einstein figure this out?

  • From my experience, there is a link between microwaves and nerve damage (my right hand
    BBC Panorama - WiFi - A Warning Signal 2
    became numb, using my laptop to scroll though a 29 page document). A Google search for, "microwave radiation nerve damage," returned 70,100 Hits. Anyway, back to my experience.
    My router was on and my laptop was picking up the signal (airport mode) and my right hand was directly above the microwave emitter of my laptop. My left hand became numb when I used it to replace my right hand after that became too numb to use.

  • There is a noticeable difference in my eyes tracking together. I did a Google search for, "WiFi muscle spasms," and got 6,980,000 Hits (8/11/14). Back to my eye tracking problems.
    I can finally start to read books with both eyes again. Videos have more depth (both eyes are 'seeing' the same image from slightly different vantage points and sending this information to my brain to be processed).

  • There is evidence (2003, Swedish) of low level microwave, cell phone, induced damage to neurons and the mammalian Blood Brain Barrier (BBB), but no increase in cancer rates. That finding is directly contradicted by a recent British study, click cancer Link to EMF radiation.

  • I have noticed that since I disabled my router (I'm not being bombarded by microwaves) my sleep patterns are returning to normal (7 12 hours/night for me). About two months ago, I was aware that eight or nine hours of sleep/night was not making me feel more rested. I felt tired after I woke up. I was really puzzled. I could not figure out why I so lethargic after so much sleep.

  • I strained my right shoulder, lifting a 35 lb jug of kitty litter on April 10, 2014. It would not heal. I was thinking that something was really wrong with my shoulder/upper arm. I was about to see my doctor about it, when I disabled the WiFi on July 17, 2014. It has mostly healed by July 29, 2014, with the WiFi disabled. My shoulder would not heal when I was being poisoned by radio waves/microwaves (WiFi).

  • My back pain has significantly lowered (I have three fused vertebrae). I forgot to take my pain medication before the router was disabled and I was freaking out from the pain. I did forget again, but this time the router was disabled - it was no big deal. From my experiences I conclude WiFi has serious biological effects on me.

I have a degree in Biochemistry. Being labeled a "Crackpot," does not "Spin-my-propeller." Radiation is to be respected and avoided. I know there is cause for concern, in spite of what industry (the people
BBC Panorama - WiFi - A Warning Signal 3
who profit off our ignorance of the reality of wireless communication) tells me. Back to my degree.

For my senior research I read more then 35 chemcal experiments and analyzed them to see if the conclusions reached were validated by the experimental results. I am very aware of charlatans that are trying to sell you magical crap that does nothing, except enrich them. Carl Sagan said, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." For example, some of these people claim they can passively effect elctromagnetic radiation (EMF). They have no suppoting evidence. From my studies I know there are three ways to effect EMF: total blockage (aluminum foil), passage through a filter (polarized sunglasses) or gravitational lensing (predicted by Einstein). They still make their outrageous claims and depend on people not knowing they are being lied to.

Based on my experience and my research, I will never use a microwave oven again. I will never use WiFi again. My router is wrapped in foil to disable the WiFi portion until I can rearrange my living space and I get a detecter to be sure it not poisoning me with microwave radiation again. Eventually, I will run an ethernet cable from my router to my laptop (direct connection), but at the moment my laptop is not connected to the Internet.

It is more inconvenient to not be able to use my laptop wherever I feel like it, but being able to think clearly,
Prof. Olle Johansson on WiFi - "Irreversible sterility within five generations"
decreased back pain, a stronger immune system (cancer protection), decent sleep, normal body repair, lack of genetic damage, etc. makes inconvenience no big deal. WiFi and cellphones are convenient, but the cost of this convenience is one I'm not willing to keep paying.

It is our responsibility to protect our children. Blindly installing WiFi in schools when we know of the mounting evidence of the health risks of exposing our children to microwave radiation is irresponsible.

Doctors can not properly diagnose symptoms when they are WiFi induced. For example; If a patient lives in a "WiFi hotspot", the symptoms may vanish away from the transmitters. Until they move or install a means for blocking WiFi radiation, they may be subjected to unnecessary medical procedures (possibly harmful too [I was referred to another doctor by my family physician. This doctor's staff wanted to inject me with a radioactive isotope in an attempt to determine the source of a WiFi induced condition - I refused, much to the staff's annoyance, They tried to guilt trip me into the procedure, I told them to go f*** themselves and walked out]). My symptoms did not reccur - end of story.

Links 1 (1 - 27; of 54)
Medical and Scientific links: Questions and research about wireless technology.
1) Dr. Franz Adlekofer, MD, Pandora Foundation, Germany
2) Dr. Bahriye Sirav Aral, Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biophysics, Turkey
3) Dr. Fiorella Belpoggi, Director, Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center, Ramazzini Institute, Italy
4) Prof. Dr. Dominique Belpomme, MD, MPH, Prof, Med. Oncol. Paris Univ. Hospital; Dir., European Cancer & Environment Research Inst., France
5) Dr. Martin Blank, PhD, Columbia University, USA
6) Prof. Marie-Claire Cammaerts, PhD, Faculty of Sciences, Free University of Brussels, Belgium
7) Dr. Ayse G. Canseven, Gazi University, Medical Faculty, Biophysics Department, Turkey
8) Dr. David Carpenter, MD, Institute for Health and the Environment, University at Albany, USA
9) Dr. Simona Carrubba, PhD, Daemen College, Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo (Neurology), USA
10) Dr. Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, President, Environmental Health Trust; Fellow, American College of Epidemiology, USA
11) Dr. Adilza C. Dode, PhD, MSc, Prof. EMF Pollution Control, Environ. Eng. Dept, Minas Methodist Univ. Ctr. Belo Horizonte, Brazil
12) Dr. Meric Arda Esmekaya, PhD, Gazi University, Biophysics Department, Turkey
13) Dr. Arzu Firlarer, MSc, PhD, Senior Researcher & Instructor, Occupational Health and Safety Department, Baskent University, Turkey
14) Dr. Adamantia F. Fragopoulou, MSc, PhD, Postdoc. Research Assoc., Dept. Cell Biology & Biophysics, Biology Faculty, Univ. of Athens, Greece
15) Dr. Christos Georgiou, Prof. Biochemistry, Biology Department, University of Patras, Greece
16) Dr. Livio Giuliani, PhD, Director of Research, Italian Health National Service, Rome-Florenze-Bozen, Italy
17) Prof. Yury Grigoriev, MD, Chairman, Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, Russia
18) Dr. Settimio Grimaldi, PhD, Associate Scientist, National Research Council, Italy
19) Dr. Claudio Gómez-Perretta, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitario la fe Valencia, Spain
20) Dr. Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden
21) Dr. Magda Havas, PhD, Environmental and Resource Studies, Centre for Health Studies, Trent University, Canada
22) Dr. Paul Héroux, PhD, Director, Occupational Health Program, McGill University Medical; InvitroPlus Labs., Royal Victoria Hospital, Canada
23) Dr. Donald Hillman, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, USA
24) Dr. Martha R. Herbert, PhD, MD, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
25) Dr. Tsuyoshi Hondou, Tohoku University, Japan
26) Dr. Olle Johansson, Associate Professor, The Experimental Dermatology Unit, Dept. of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Sweden
27) Dr. Florian M. Koenig, DrSc, Director of Fl. König Enterprises GmbH, Sferics & Meteorosensitivity Research Inst., Germering, Germany

Imagine cigarettes advertised without warning labels? Why is that true for wireless connections?
All Medical and Scientific research articles that I have read are in complete agreement:
Wireless technology (microwave radiation) is harmful to people. We are not informed of this.

Does our government need to create an agency to keep us safe from microwave radiation?

Wireless technology needs prominent warning labels so we can decide, if the risks are worth the purchase.

Based on my experience and the opinions of scientists doing research on wireless technology,
this Biochemistry graduate recommends seven things to minimize microwave radiation exposure:

  1. Use hands free technology with cell phones. Do not carry a cell phone next to your skin, unless it is either, completely shielded or completely off.

  2. Do not allow children to handle your cell phone.

  3. Use direct connections (cables) to connect with the Internet.

  4. Avoid use of wireless connections. Move printers and other wireless devices to where a cable can connect them. I am moving my laptop so I can connect to the Internet with ether net. a cable connection.

  5. Do not use wireless connections without protection from the radio waves. These microwave connections are convenient. However, do not confuse, convenience, with, safety. Do not assume, because it is available, it must be safe. It, first, has to be tested for safety for that to be true.

  6. If you must use a wireless connection, turn the router off at night and when you are not connected to the Internet. If you don't want to to keep turning your router on and off, a foil hat that completely encloses the router (see, NO WIFI) works also.

  7. Get a microwave radiation detector with an audible alarm and use it.

Technology is a wonderful thing, but so is our health.

Links 2 (28 - 54; of 54)
Medical and Scientific links: Questions and research about wireless technology.
28) Dr. Kavindra Kumar Kesari, MBA, PhD; Res. Sci., Dept. Environmental Sciences, Univ. Eastern Finland, Finland: Jaipur Nat. Univ., India
29) Prof. Girish Kumar, IIT Bombay - microwaves and antennas, India
30) Dr. Henry Lai, PhD, University of Washington, USA
31) Dr. Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, DSc, Editor-in-Chief: Frontiers in Radiation and Health, Switzerland; Prof, Univ. of Helsinki, Finland
32) Dr. Ying Li, PhD, InVitroPlus Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Royal Victoria Hospital McGill University Medicine, Canada
33) Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Löscher, Head, Dept. Pharmacology & Toxicology, Univ. Veterinary Medicine; Center for Neuroscience, Hannover, Germany
34) Dr. Lukas H. Margaritis, PhD, Prof. Emeritus, Department of Cell Biology and Biophysics, Biology Faculty, University of Athens, Greece
35) Dr. Marko Markov, PhD, Research International Buffalo, USA
36) Dr. Samuel Milham, MD, MPH, USA
37) Dr. Anthony Miller, MD, University of Toronto, Canada
38) Dr. Hidetake Miyata, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Tohoku University, Japan
39) L. Lloyd Morgan, Senior Research Fellow, Environmental Health Trust, USA
40) Dr. Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA
41) Dr. Raymond Richard Neutra, MD, PhD, USA
42) Dr. Gerd Oberfeld, MD, Speaker Environmental Medicine, Austrian Medical Association; Public Health, Salzburg Government, Austria
43) Dr. Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp, PhD, Department of Psychology (Neuroscience), University of Western Ontario, Canada
44) Dr. Elcin Ozgur, PhD, Biophysics Department, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey
45) Dr. Martin Pall, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University, USA
46) Dr. Michael A. Persinger, Professor, Behavioural Neuroscience, Biomolecular Sciences & Human Studies, Laurentian University, Canada
47) Dr. Jerry L. Phillips, PhD, Center for Excellence in Science, Prof, Dept. Chem. & Biochem., University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, USA
48) Dr Timur Saliev, MD, PhD, Life Sciences, Nazarbayev Univ., Kazakhstan; Institute Medical Science/Technology, University of Dundee, UK
49) Dr. Alvaro Augusto de Salles, PhD, Professor, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
50) Prof. Dr. Nesrin Seyhan, Medical Faculty, Gazi University; Founding Chair, Biophysics Dept, WHO EMF Advisory Committee, Turkey
51) Dr. Wenjun Sun, PhD, Professor, Bioelectromagnetics Key Laboratory, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
52) Dr. Mehmet Z. Tuyzuz, PhD, Gazi University, Biophysics Department, Turkey
53) Dr. Lebrecht von Klitzing, PhD, Head of Inst., Environ. Physics; Former Head, Clinical Research, Medical Univ. Luebeck, Germany
54) Dr. Stelios A. Zinelis, MD, Hellenic Cancer Society, Greece
Wireless technology has not been extensively tested. Every test has shown it to be unsafe.
Wireless technology (WiFi) comes with a steep price that has been deliberately hidden from us.
Microwave radiation causes:
  • Formation of Free-Radicals which can damage our health.

  • Misdiagnosis of our symptoms by doctors.

  • Damage to the health of our children.

  • Damage to the health of future generations.

All wireless technology should carry
A Warning Label
That warns about the suspected hazards
of wireless technology (microwave radiation).

Rehabilitating people surviving formerly lethal events.
  • Every college and university needs to have a, "Department of Rehabilitation," to assist TBI survivors with putting their lives back together.

  • The departments that deal with disabled students will be a subcatagory of the Department of Rehabilitation and will only deal with temporarily disabled students - they have shown that they are poorly trained in meeting the needs of the weakest members of our society. They should have little contact with permanently disabled students.

  • At the first class meeting the instructor should announce they are seeking writing and lab assistants to aid in disabled student's rehabilitation, that students who volunteer will be paid, have a reduced class load and benefit from having the time to learn the material throughly.

  • Assistants will require more time to graduate, but their financial aid will not be affected.

  • Assisting in rehabilitation will count as academic credit.

  • This will cost money, but the people of DSS, DSPandS and DRC have shown that they will ridicule and marginalize their clients if things do not change.

  • Without regulation and their use of "Plausible Deniability” (deliberate avoidence of feedback); the people of DSS, DSPandS and DRC ensured my mediocre education.

  • These guidelines will cost more then is currently being spent, but I am living proof of why we need to change the present system.

Staff that work with head injury Survivors need to be trained on working with Head Injury Survivors. I have experienced first hand the discrimination that results from Staff that rely on stereotypes of TBI. The ADA needs to be amended to prevent the sort of preconceptions, I encountered, from continuing to happen. I have included seven suggestions based on my extensive
experience with Staff People who feel the ADA does not apply to them and the clients they serve.
  1. Establishment of a committee, made up of men and women, whose purpose is to see that the ADA is being followed. The Staff People I dealt with have shown what they will do when no one is checking up on them or asking their clients if their disability is being accommodated?

  2. The staff People who relegate services to disabled students need to be required to attend the first class meeting (preferably an upper division science class that they can not understand) wearing a shirt that says, “I'm a freak, don't talk to me,” to get an idea of what social isolation and ridicule are like.

  3. Colleges and Universities that do not serve all citizens, will receive no federal dollars for anything (this includes financial aid) - no exception.

  4. Disabled students need to be told of their rights every time they register for a class.

  5. Staff people need to be liable for criminal prosecution for denial of accommodation. An equivalent length of time the disabled student is at school (two semesters or three quarters, per year) is a reasonable length of time for a disabled student to file a lawsuit.

  6. A feedback/posting mechanism is required.

  7. Mandatory fines and imprisonment for people in Higher Education who do not to do the job they are being paid to do.

  8. Staff people who are convicted of denying accommodation to a Disabled Student will be barred for life from working with Disabled Students.

There must be consequences for breaking the law or staff people will continue to flaunt the ADA it and we will continue to lose out on head injury survivors contributions to our society.



Rehabilitating head injury Survivors is serious business. It gives us the opportunity to use what we still have to benefit ourselves, our peers and the human race to which we belong.

"Very strange people, physicists - in my experience the ones who aren't dead are in some way very ill" - Mr Standish "The Long Dark Tea-Time Of The Soul" by Douglas Adams

Section 1 (of 2).
Decriminalize head injury.
  • Toughen and Enforce The ADA in higher education.
  • Make feedback mandatory.
  • Make staff accountable for their actions.
[Page 4]
Top [Page 4]

I am not aware of any psychological testing for positions, where the applicant will be in contact with people they can take advantage of (head injury Survivors). The possibility for Constitutional Rights violations and Human Rights violations is significant, my experience bears that out. People with sadistic tendencies should have little, to no, contact with disabled students (new victims).

I see no reason to expect the Staff People who bullied me (and other clients of their's) are any different from other Staff People in similar positions across our country. This does not bode well for the increasing number of, men and women, surviving, formerly lethal accidents, traumatic incidents and Military mishaps.

The case for reform our system of Higher Education can not be made better, than the rationale by UCSC for what they did to me. They provided the spark, fuel and gasoline for the fire that consumed my life. The "Assistant Chancellor/Chief of Staff", in this pdf (from UCSC), implied what happened to me was my fault. Consider this:

  • If UCSC Chancellor George Blumenthol had been dependent on DSS, DSPandS and DRC

    for his undergraduate education, he would have a similar academic record to mine. It might have taken him an additional 18 years of dropped, repeated and failed classes to acquire basic knowledge of his major - it did me. Is there any graduate school in the world foolish enough to accept a student that took 26 years to acquire his undergraduate knowledge for his major?

  • It is ironic that one of the people that works for him is justifying and rationalizing the very system that would have prevented undergraduate George Blumenthol from becoming his boss.

A student riding in a train looks up to see Albert Einstein struggling through the other passengers near the door. Einstein forces his way into the crowded car, looks around, spies the vacant seat next to the student and gestures.
The student nods and Einstein makes his way through the passengers and luggage and sinks into the empty seat next to the student. The student is beside himself. He is sitting next to the most famous man in America. He tells himself to remain calm, to act unperturbed. He finally decides he is going to start a conversation with the man sitting next to him. To demonstrate his ignorance and therefore indifference to the status of the man seated beside him he coolly asks, "Excuse me, professor. Does Boston stop at this train?"

June 28, 2014
DSS, DSPandS and DRC succeeded in wasting almost two decades of my life. When I should have been hanging out with my friends, having and raising
children, they made sure I was socially isolated, desperately trying to write my homework and focusing how bad I felt about myself (the entire time I was aware of how my social life was crumbling). That, the people that were paid to help me, instead, were deliberately trying to sabotage me, was a thought that never occurred to me. I can't figure why anyone would bully a head injury survivor?.
Why did they hate me? Was it my voice? Maybe they did not hate me, but had a funny way of showing affection and pride for their clients? Whatever their motivation, the fact is they deliberately violated my constitutional right to a quality education, because there was no oversight - they could get away with it, plus there was no feedback, so, they could treat me like trash, because no one would ever find out. They thought, I was so beaten down, I would never talk about them, however things did not work the way they had planned.
After 26 years of college and universty education I still do not have the knowledge to engage in cancer research. Should I feel whipped? I do not know. What I do know is, I am really angry for what they did to people whose lives I could have helped save, if DSS, DSPandS and DRC had not engaged in 24 years of nasty psychological torture (“Social Isolation” and “Learned Helplessness”) on me.
People often tell me I am the smartest person they have ever known. That remark illustrates perfectly why there needs to be oversight over these people, so that what happened to me never happens to another person.
Anyway, cancer research (Immunotherapy) was my passion. Look at the video above and you will get a sense of why I feel so strongly about this issue and why I refuse to shut up and go away. The woman at the left, Edith Laree Parker, died of brain cancer in 2007. Could my research have helped save her life? We will never know, thanks to the staff of DSS, DSPandS and DRC; their deliberate and illegal withholding of accommodation for my disability.


Section 2 (of 2).
Decriminalize head injury.
  • Toughen and Enforce The ADA in higher education.
  • Make feedback mandatory.
  • Make staff accountable for their actions.
[Page 4]
Top [Page 4]

I am so appreciative of the skill and training of the men and women who saved my life and their dedication to proper care for my injuries which prevented me from being paralyzed.

I focus on what I can do. I can't walk on the moon - I am not depressed by that fact.
Don't assume you know how I feel about life without asking me.

We need to experimentally verify something is safe, before rushing to use it. WiFi is proven to be unsafe, it should be removed from everywhere. Wireless communication is this new technology that can have serious health consequences. Is there cause for concern? I think so. Is this new technology worth the coveneniece of genetic damage, cancer, nerve damage, birth defects, headaches, nausea, inhibited body repair, misdiagnosis, disrupted sleep patterns, general fatigue etc..? I do not think so, but maybe my opinion is unique to me. People need to have the facts so they can decide. Maybe wireless technology is something they want to use, maybe it isn't. We live in a democracy, give people access to the information about this new technology and let them decide.

I want to start a conversation about treating head injury survivors like people and rehabilitating us - head injury survivors and veterans with head injury. TBI is a 'new' disability. Until recently, TBI killed everyone that suffered it. Now we are surviving formerly lethal accidents, incidents and Military mishaps. People are employed to rehabilitate us. They are not being employed to waste our time and money.

Help me change this system so that Staff People can not use, “Social Isolation” and “Learned Helplessness”, to make TBI Survivors docile and easy to manipulate ever. Instead we need to educate students with TBI.

Anthony Walton

Done.

>
24 years of emotional trauma at the college and university.
I was the top student in Organic Chemistry at UC Santa Cruz in the summer of 1982.
A year later, in mid-summer 1983, a 165 foot rock climbing fall did not end my life or paralyze me, despite breaking my back. I woke six weeks later to an unforseen lifestyle change. While unconcious, I had been transfomed into a criminal who survived a traumatic accident with a head injury.
As I have never been imprisoned: “Social Isolation” and “Learned Helplessness” were two new concepts to me. These two policies would ruin 32 years of my life; leaving me with no way to afford a family, few friends and a terrible self image.
After 24 years of schooling, I am disabled, poor, unemployed and unemployable, because I was fooled into believing staff people were interested in helping educate me.
Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4
An indifferent reality.

In Fall 1984, my 24 year educational experience of paranoid loneliness and social isolation from my peers and the people around me was begun at the UC campus.

The organizations that help disabled students with their education, attempted to make me go away by denying me accommodation for my disability.

This was a deliberate event. I can not imagine why anyone would treat a law abiding American Citizen like a criminal, though I have tried.

The Staff people that did this to me were (and are) sadistic monsters who broke the law.

My diploma in Biochemistry.

24 years of psychological torture, “Social Isolation” and “Learned Helplessness” for the final year of my degree. They had conditioned me in 1984/1985 to get used to being treated badly (sadistically) by them and I no longer protested anything about my treatment after initially being attacked whenever I had.

The staff I was forced to work with at the UC campus and the Community College ignored parts of the ADA from its passage in 1990, until Spring 2008 (one of them bragged to me in October 2009), I finally realized these people had no intention of ever doing their job and I finally dropped out of school.

Educational Aftermath.
My life is really sad, isolated and depressing,
because I refused to give up hope for my rehabilitation. I kept looking forwards, trying to ignore the the subtle, but constant, sadism from the staff that were helping me and would not drop out of school for 24 years.

Senior research.

What these Staff people did to me is not unique to the UC campus and the community college I attended. The attitude they were using to justify their actions was evident wherever I looked on the Internet.

Internet research.

Decriminalize head injury.
  • TBI survivors are not criminals or freaks - educate us.
  • Toughen and Enforce The ADA.
  • Make feedback mandatory.
  • Make staff accountable for their actions.

There is strong correlation between cell phone use and brain cancer. Follow these links (54) to scientific studies and opinions.

Links 1 - 27 or Links 28 - 54

As a head injury survivor, I needed
help with my education, but that
is not what I got.

You are here
Public employess chose to deprive the human race of a needed, dedicated and intelligent, cancer researcher (me), because they could.
These people intentionally ruined my chances to live a normal life and provide for a family because I am a head injury survivor.
Please help me expose them. Send links of this website with a brief explanation to every US government agency,
US government official, US government employee, anyone and/or media sources or organizations you can think of.

Access 1 Access 2 Access 3

Links to student access issues Site Map
Lecture
Experience
Laboratory
Experience
Student
Details
Student
Assistants